Prefer explicitly using serde_derive instead of the "derive" feature of serde

[kevinheavey]

Problem

Using the "derive" feature of serde is bad for compile times as explained here serde-rs/serde#2584

Summary of Changes

• Deactivates the "derive" feature of serde everywhere and replaces it with explicit use of serde_derive
• Makes the serde_derive version match the serde version in the main workspace
• Removes the serde dep entirely from programs/address-lookup-table

[joncinque]

Looks good to me! Just some nits to add comments about the versioning

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.93939% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.8%. Comparing base (0214743) to head (e48189a).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #1329     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    82.8%    82.8%   -0.1%     
=========================================
  Files         867      867             
  Lines      368875   368873      -2     
=========================================
- Hits       305646   305642      -4     
- Misses      63229    63231      +2     

[joncinque]

Thanks!