Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Bug/6366 optimize first email #117

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 21, 2025
Merged

Conversation

HavierD
Copy link
Contributor

@HavierD HavierD commented Feb 19, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@utas-raymondng utas-raymondng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I recall a need to add comment on why push the email to ogc api, not sure if I miss but didn't seems to see it here

@@ -30,6 +30,11 @@
<artifactId>auth</artifactId>
<version>2.29.52</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you put the depends version into the parent pom.xml dependency Management section? This applies to the all with version inside this pom.xml

@HavierD
Copy link
Contributor Author

HavierD commented Feb 21, 2025

I recall a need to add comment on why push the email to ogc api, not sure if I miss but didn't seems to see it here

Yes i put the comment in line 56 of Restapi (where invoking the notifyUser function)

Copy link
Collaborator

@utas-raymondng utas-raymondng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One last comment

@@ -137,6 +137,21 @@
<artifactId>spatial4j</artifactId>
<version>0.8</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Move duplicate version to a property above will save effort later

@HavierD HavierD marked this pull request as draft February 21, 2025 00:45
@HavierD HavierD marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2025 00:51
Copy link
Collaborator

@utas-raymondng utas-raymondng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@utas-raymondng utas-raymondng merged commit 9dd93dd into main Feb 21, 2025
2 checks passed
@utas-raymondng utas-raymondng deleted the bug/6366-optimize-first-email branch February 21, 2025 01:56
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants