-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Add example for writing SQL analysis using DataFusion structures #10938
Merged
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2199774
sql analysis example
LorrensP-2158466 5db1dfd
update examples readme
LorrensP-2158466 137160d
update comments
LorrensP-2158466 4157d6a
Merge branch 'apache:main' into main
LorrensP-2158466 07bbe95
Merge branch 'apache:main' into main
LorrensP-2158466 856a6c8
Update datafusion-examples/examples/sql_analysis.rs
LorrensP-2158466 adc30ff
apply feedback
LorrensP-2158466 89cea57
Run tapelo to fix Cargo.toml formatting
alamb 2e0cd1a
Tweak comments
alamb e280cb8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'apache/main' into LorrensP-2158466/main
alamb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,287 @@ | ||
// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one | ||
// or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file | ||
// distributed with this work for additional information | ||
// regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file | ||
// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the | ||
// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance | ||
// with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
// | ||
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
// | ||
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, | ||
// software distributed under the License is distributed on an | ||
// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY | ||
// KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the | ||
// specific language governing permissions and limitations | ||
// under the License. | ||
|
||
//! This example shows how we can use the structures that DataFusion provide to perform | ||
//! SQL Analysis. | ||
//! We'll show how we can count the amount of join's in a query as well as how many | ||
//! join tree's there are with their respective join count | ||
|
||
use std::sync::Arc; | ||
|
||
use datafusion::common::Result; | ||
use datafusion::{ | ||
datasource::MemTable, | ||
execution::context::{SessionConfig, SessionContext}, | ||
}; | ||
use datafusion_common::tree_node::{TreeNode, TreeNodeRecursion}; | ||
use datafusion_expr::LogicalPlan; | ||
use test_utils::tpcds::tpcds_schemas; | ||
|
||
/// Counts the total number of joins in a plan | ||
fn total_join_count(plan: &LogicalPlan) -> usize { | ||
let mut total = 0; | ||
|
||
// We can use the TreeNode API to walk over a LogicalPlan. | ||
plan.apply(|node| { | ||
// if we encouter a join we update the total | ||
if matches!(node, LogicalPlan::Join(_) | LogicalPlan::CrossJoin(_)) { | ||
total += 1; | ||
} | ||
Ok(TreeNodeRecursion::Continue) | ||
}) | ||
.unwrap(); | ||
|
||
total | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Counts the total amount of joins and collects every join tree in the plan with their respective join count | ||
/// A join tree is defined as the largest sub trees which consistt entirely of joins | ||
/// | ||
/// For example: | ||
/// | ||
/// JOIN | ||
/// / \ | ||
/// A JOIN | ||
/// / \ | ||
/// B C | ||
/// | ||
/// has a single join tree (A-B-C) which will result in (2, [2]) | ||
/// but this plan: | ||
/// | ||
/// JOIN | ||
/// / \ | ||
/// A GROUP | ||
/// | | ||
/// JOIN | ||
/// / \ | ||
/// B C | ||
/// | ||
/// Has two join trees (A-, B-C) which will result in (2, [1, 1]) | ||
fn count_trees(plan: &LogicalPlan) -> (usize, Vec<usize>) { | ||
alamb marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
// this works the same way as `total_count`, but now when we encounter a Join | ||
// we try to collect it's entire tree | ||
let mut to_visit = vec![plan]; | ||
let mut total = 0; | ||
let mut groups = vec![]; | ||
|
||
while let Some(node) = to_visit.pop() { | ||
// if we encouter a join, we know were at the root of the tree | ||
// count this tree and recurse on it's inputs | ||
if matches!(node, LogicalPlan::Join(_) | LogicalPlan::CrossJoin(_)) { | ||
let (group_count, inputs) = count_tree(node); | ||
total += group_count; | ||
groups.push(group_count); | ||
to_visit.extend(inputs); | ||
} else { | ||
to_visit.extend(node.inputs()); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
(total, groups) | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Count the entire join tree and return it's inputs using TreeNode API | ||
/// So if this function receives following plan: | ||
/// | ||
/// JOIN | ||
/// / \ | ||
/// A GROUP | ||
/// | | ||
/// JOIN | ||
/// / \ | ||
/// B C | ||
/// | ||
/// It will return (1, [A, GROUP]) | ||
fn count_tree(join: &LogicalPlan) -> (usize, Vec<&LogicalPlan>) { | ||
let mut inputs = Vec::new(); | ||
let mut total = 0; | ||
|
||
join.apply(|node| { | ||
// Some extra knowledge: | ||
// optimized plans have their projections pushed down as far as possible, which sometimes results in a projection going in between 2 subsequent joins | ||
// giving the illusion these joins are not "related", when in fact they are. | ||
// This plan: | ||
// JOIN | ||
// / \ | ||
// A PROJECTION | ||
// | | ||
// JOIN | ||
// / \ | ||
// B C | ||
// is the same as: | ||
// JOIN | ||
// / \ | ||
// A JOIN | ||
// / \ | ||
// B C | ||
// we can continue the recursion in this case | ||
if let LogicalPlan::Projection(_) = node { | ||
return Ok(TreeNodeRecursion::Continue); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// any join we count | ||
if matches!(node, LogicalPlan::Join(_) | LogicalPlan::CrossJoin(_)) { | ||
total += 1; | ||
Ok(TreeNodeRecursion::Continue) | ||
} else { | ||
inputs.push(node); | ||
// skip children of input node | ||
Ok(TreeNodeRecursion::Jump) | ||
} | ||
}) | ||
.unwrap(); | ||
|
||
(total, inputs) | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[tokio::main] | ||
async fn main() -> Result<()> { | ||
// To show how we can count the joins in a sql query we'll be using query 88 from the | ||
// TPC-DS benchmark. It has a lot of joins, cross-joins and multiple join-trees, perfect for our example | ||
|
||
let tpcds_query_88 = " | ||
select * | ||
from | ||
(select count(*) h8_30_to_9 | ||
from store_sales, household_demographics , time_dim, store | ||
where ss_sold_time_sk = time_dim.t_time_sk | ||
and ss_hdemo_sk = household_demographics.hd_demo_sk | ||
and ss_store_sk = s_store_sk | ||
and time_dim.t_hour = 8 | ||
and time_dim.t_minute >= 30 | ||
and ((household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 3 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=3+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 0 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=0+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 1 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=1+2)) | ||
and store.s_store_name = 'ese') s1, | ||
(select count(*) h9_to_9_30 | ||
from store_sales, household_demographics , time_dim, store | ||
where ss_sold_time_sk = time_dim.t_time_sk | ||
and ss_hdemo_sk = household_demographics.hd_demo_sk | ||
and ss_store_sk = s_store_sk | ||
and time_dim.t_hour = 9 | ||
and time_dim.t_minute < 30 | ||
and ((household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 3 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=3+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 0 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=0+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 1 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=1+2)) | ||
and store.s_store_name = 'ese') s2, | ||
(select count(*) h9_30_to_10 | ||
from store_sales, household_demographics , time_dim, store | ||
where ss_sold_time_sk = time_dim.t_time_sk | ||
and ss_hdemo_sk = household_demographics.hd_demo_sk | ||
and ss_store_sk = s_store_sk | ||
and time_dim.t_hour = 9 | ||
and time_dim.t_minute >= 30 | ||
and ((household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 3 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=3+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 0 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=0+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 1 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=1+2)) | ||
and store.s_store_name = 'ese') s3, | ||
(select count(*) h10_to_10_30 | ||
from store_sales, household_demographics , time_dim, store | ||
where ss_sold_time_sk = time_dim.t_time_sk | ||
and ss_hdemo_sk = household_demographics.hd_demo_sk | ||
and ss_store_sk = s_store_sk | ||
and time_dim.t_hour = 10 | ||
and time_dim.t_minute < 30 | ||
and ((household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 3 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=3+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 0 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=0+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 1 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=1+2)) | ||
and store.s_store_name = 'ese') s4, | ||
(select count(*) h10_30_to_11 | ||
from store_sales, household_demographics , time_dim, store | ||
where ss_sold_time_sk = time_dim.t_time_sk | ||
and ss_hdemo_sk = household_demographics.hd_demo_sk | ||
and ss_store_sk = s_store_sk | ||
and time_dim.t_hour = 10 | ||
and time_dim.t_minute >= 30 | ||
and ((household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 3 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=3+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 0 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=0+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 1 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=1+2)) | ||
and store.s_store_name = 'ese') s5, | ||
(select count(*) h11_to_11_30 | ||
from store_sales, household_demographics , time_dim, store | ||
where ss_sold_time_sk = time_dim.t_time_sk | ||
and ss_hdemo_sk = household_demographics.hd_demo_sk | ||
and ss_store_sk = s_store_sk | ||
and time_dim.t_hour = 11 | ||
and time_dim.t_minute < 30 | ||
and ((household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 3 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=3+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 0 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=0+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 1 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=1+2)) | ||
and store.s_store_name = 'ese') s6, | ||
(select count(*) h11_30_to_12 | ||
from store_sales, household_demographics , time_dim, store | ||
where ss_sold_time_sk = time_dim.t_time_sk | ||
and ss_hdemo_sk = household_demographics.hd_demo_sk | ||
and ss_store_sk = s_store_sk | ||
and time_dim.t_hour = 11 | ||
and time_dim.t_minute >= 30 | ||
and ((household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 3 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=3+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 0 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=0+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 1 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=1+2)) | ||
and store.s_store_name = 'ese') s7, | ||
(select count(*) h12_to_12_30 | ||
from store_sales, household_demographics , time_dim, store | ||
where ss_sold_time_sk = time_dim.t_time_sk | ||
and ss_hdemo_sk = household_demographics.hd_demo_sk | ||
and ss_store_sk = s_store_sk | ||
and time_dim.t_hour = 12 | ||
and time_dim.t_minute < 30 | ||
and ((household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 3 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=3+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 0 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=0+2) or | ||
(household_demographics.hd_dep_count = 1 and household_demographics.hd_vehicle_count<=1+2)) | ||
and store.s_store_name = 'ese') s8;"; | ||
|
||
// first set up the config | ||
let config = SessionConfig::default(); | ||
let ctx = SessionContext::new_with_config(config); | ||
|
||
// register the tables of the TPC-DS query | ||
let tables = tpcds_schemas(); | ||
for table in tables { | ||
ctx.register_table( | ||
table.name, | ||
Arc::new(MemTable::try_new(Arc::new(table.schema.clone()), vec![])?), | ||
)?; | ||
} | ||
// We can create a logicalplan from a SQL query like this | ||
let logical_plan = ctx.sql(tpcds_query_88).await?.into_optimized_plan()?; | ||
|
||
println!( | ||
"Optimized Logical Plan:\n\n{}\n", | ||
logical_plan.display_indent() | ||
); | ||
// we can get the total count (query 88 has 31 joins: 7 CROSS joins and 24 INNER joins => 40 input relations) | ||
let total_join_count = total_join_count(&logical_plan); | ||
assert_eq!(31, total_join_count); | ||
|
||
println!("The plan has {total_join_count} joins."); | ||
|
||
// Furthermore the 24 inner joins are 8 groups of 3 joins with the 7 cross-joins combining them | ||
// we can get these groups using the `count_trees` method | ||
let (total_join_count, trees) = count_trees(&logical_plan); | ||
assert_eq!( | ||
(total_join_count, &trees), | ||
// query 88 is very straightforward, we know the cross-join group is at the top of the plan followed by the INNER joins | ||
(31, &vec![7, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3]) | ||
); | ||
|
||
println!( | ||
"And following join-trees (number represents join amount in tree): {trees:?}" | ||
); | ||
|
||
Ok(()) | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍