-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Add documentation about performance PRs, add (TBD) section on feature criteria #12372
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
2. Is the code clear, and fits the style of the existing codebase? | ||
|
||
## Performance Improvements |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the new content
|
||
Please ensure any issues you raise contains a rationale and suggested alternative -- it is frustrating to be told "don't do it this way" without any clear reason or alternate provided. | ||
|
||
Some things to specifically check: | ||
|
||
1. Is the feature or fix covered sufficiently with tests (see `Test Organization` below)? | ||
1. Is the feature or fix covered sufficiently with tests (see the [Testing](testing.md) section)? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added link (there is actually no Testing Organization
section anymore below)
- [System level SQL Benchmarks](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/tree/main/benchmarks) | ||
- Microbenchmarks such as those in [functions/benches](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/tree/main/datafusion/functions/benches) | ||
|
||
If there is no suitable existing benchmark, you can create a new one. It helps |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good point, very often reviewing PRs we have to ask showing the actual performance benefit with existing benches or other performance tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, thanks @alamb it looks more clear now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thanks @alamb This change makes the guide more friendly, especially for newcomers.
Which issue does this PR close?
Related to #12357
Rationale for this change
I think there is some "common knowledge" that is not explicitly written down anywhere
Specifically, that performance improvements should be accompanied by benchmark results (most recently this came up in #12270)
What changes are included in this PR?
Note I am not trying to change anything, only document the current reality.
Are these changes tested?
by doc CI
Are there any user-facing changes?
Docs