Skip to content

feat: Implement grouping function using grouping id #12704

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/grouping.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ impl Grouping {
/// Create a new GROUPING aggregate function.
pub fn new() -> Self {
Self {
signature: Signature::any(1, Volatility::Immutable),
signature: Signature::variadic_any(Volatility::Immutable),
}
}
}
Expand Down
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions datafusion/optimizer/src/analyzer/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ use datafusion_expr::{Expr, LogicalPlan};
use crate::analyzer::count_wildcard_rule::CountWildcardRule;
use crate::analyzer::expand_wildcard_rule::ExpandWildcardRule;
use crate::analyzer::inline_table_scan::InlineTableScan;
use crate::analyzer::resolve_grouping_function::ResolveGroupingFunction;
use crate::analyzer::subquery::check_subquery_expr;
use crate::analyzer::type_coercion::TypeCoercion;
use crate::utils::log_plan;
Expand All @@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ pub mod count_wildcard_rule;
pub mod expand_wildcard_rule;
pub mod function_rewrite;
pub mod inline_table_scan;
pub mod resolve_grouping_function;
pub mod subquery;
pub mod type_coercion;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -96,6 +98,7 @@ impl Analyzer {
// Every rule that will generate [Expr::Wildcard] should be placed in front of [ExpandWildcardRule].
Arc::new(ExpandWildcardRule::new()),
// [Expr::Wildcard] should be expanded before [TypeCoercion]
Arc::new(ResolveGroupingFunction::new()),
Arc::new(TypeCoercion::new()),
Arc::new(CountWildcardRule::new()),
];
Expand Down
247 changes: 247 additions & 0 deletions datafusion/optimizer/src/analyzer/resolve_grouping_function.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
// or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
// distributed with this work for additional information
// regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
// with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
// KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
// specific language governing permissions and limitations
// under the License.

//! Analyzed rule to replace TableScan references
//! such as DataFrames and Views and inlines the LogicalPlan.

use std::cmp::Ordering;
use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::sync::Arc;

use crate::analyzer::AnalyzerRule;

use arrow::datatypes::DataType;
use datafusion_common::config::ConfigOptions;
use datafusion_common::tree_node::{Transformed, TransformedResult, TreeNode};
use datafusion_common::{
internal_datafusion_err, plan_err, Column, DFSchemaRef, Result, ScalarValue,
};
use datafusion_expr::expr::{AggregateFunction, Alias};
use datafusion_expr::logical_plan::LogicalPlan;
use datafusion_expr::utils::grouping_set_to_exprlist;
use datafusion_expr::{
bitwise_and, bitwise_or, bitwise_shift_left, bitwise_shift_right, cast, Aggregate,
Expr, Projection,
};
use itertools::Itertools;

/// Replaces grouping aggregation function with value derived from internal grouping id
#[derive(Default, Debug)]
pub struct ResolveGroupingFunction;

impl ResolveGroupingFunction {
pub fn new() -> Self {
Self {}
}
}

impl AnalyzerRule for ResolveGroupingFunction {
fn analyze(&self, plan: LogicalPlan, _: &ConfigOptions) -> Result<LogicalPlan> {
plan.transform_up(analyze_internal).data()
}

fn name(&self) -> &str {
"resolve_grouping_function"
}
}

/// Create a map from grouping expr to index in the internal grouping id.
///
/// For more details on how the grouping id bitmap works the documentation for
/// [[Aggregate::INTERNAL_GROUPING_ID]]
fn group_expr_to_bitmap_index(group_expr: &[Expr]) -> Result<HashMap<&Expr, usize>> {
Ok(grouping_set_to_exprlist(group_expr)?
.into_iter()
.rev()
.enumerate()
.map(|(idx, v)| (v, idx))
.collect::<HashMap<_, _>>())
}

fn replace_grouping_exprs(
input: Arc<LogicalPlan>,
schema: DFSchemaRef,
group_expr: Vec<Expr>,
aggr_expr: Vec<Expr>,
) -> Result<LogicalPlan> {
// Create HashMap from Expr to index in the grouping_id bitmap
let is_grouping_set = matches!(group_expr.as_slice(), [Expr::GroupingSet(_)]);
let group_expr_to_bitmap_index = group_expr_to_bitmap_index(&group_expr)?;
let columns = schema.columns();
let mut new_agg_expr = Vec::new();
let mut projection_exprs = Vec::new();
let grouping_id_len = if is_grouping_set { 1 } else { 0 };
let group_expr_len = columns.len() - aggr_expr.len() - grouping_id_len;
projection_exprs.extend(
columns
.iter()
.take(group_expr_len)
.map(|column| Expr::Column(column.clone())),
);
for (expr, column) in aggr_expr
.into_iter()
.zip(columns.into_iter().skip(group_expr_len + grouping_id_len))
{
match expr {
Expr::AggregateFunction(ref function) if is_grouping_function(&expr) => {
let grouping_expr = grouping_function_on_id(
function,
&group_expr_to_bitmap_index,
is_grouping_set,
)?;
projection_exprs.push(Expr::Alias(Alias::new(
grouping_expr,
column.relation,
column.name,
)));
}
_ => {
projection_exprs.push(Expr::Column(column));
new_agg_expr.push(expr);
}
}
}
// Recreate aggregate without grouping functions
let new_aggregate =
LogicalPlan::Aggregate(Aggregate::try_new(input, group_expr, new_agg_expr)?);
// Create projection with grouping functions calculations
let projection = LogicalPlan::Projection(Projection::try_new(
projection_exprs,
new_aggregate.into(),
)?);
Ok(projection)
}

fn analyze_internal(plan: LogicalPlan) -> Result<Transformed<LogicalPlan>> {
// rewrite any subqueries in the plan first
let transformed_plan =
plan.map_subqueries(|plan| plan.transform_up(analyze_internal))?;

let transformed_plan = transformed_plan.transform_data(|plan| match plan {
LogicalPlan::Aggregate(Aggregate {
input,
group_expr,
aggr_expr,
schema,
..
}) if contains_grouping_function(&aggr_expr) => Ok(Transformed::yes(
replace_grouping_exprs(input, schema, group_expr, aggr_expr)?,
)),
_ => Ok(Transformed::no(plan)),
})?;

Ok(transformed_plan)
}

fn is_grouping_function(expr: &Expr) -> bool {
// TODO: Do something better than name here should grouping be a built
// in expression?
matches!(expr, Expr::AggregateFunction(AggregateFunction { ref func, .. }) if func.name() == "grouping")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

perhaps we can extend AggregateFunction 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was thinking maybe adding Expr::Grouping but we match on Expr exhaustively in quite a few places so it becomes a semi big change.

The thing with the grouping function does not look that much like a aggregate function except for that where it can appear in sql. But it does not support extra AggregateFunction stuff like order by/null treatment/filter/distinct.

}

fn contains_grouping_function(exprs: &[Expr]) -> bool {
exprs.iter().any(is_grouping_function)
}

/// Validate that the arguments to the grouping function are in the group by clause.
fn validate_args(
function: &AggregateFunction,
group_by_expr: &HashMap<&Expr, usize>,
) -> Result<()> {
let expr_not_in_group_by = function
.args
.iter()
.find(|expr| !group_by_expr.contains_key(expr));
if let Some(expr) = expr_not_in_group_by {
plan_err!(
"Argument {} to grouping function is not in grouping columns {}",
expr,
group_by_expr.keys().map(|e| e.to_string()).join(", ")
)
} else {
Ok(())
}
}

fn grouping_function_on_id(
function: &AggregateFunction,
group_by_expr: &HashMap<&Expr, usize>,
is_grouping_set: bool,
) -> Result<Expr> {
validate_args(function, group_by_expr)?;
let args = &function.args;

// Postgres allows grouping function for group by without grouping sets, the result is then
// always 0
if !is_grouping_set {
return Ok(Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::from(0i32)));
}

let group_by_expr_count = group_by_expr.len();
let literal = |value: usize| {
if group_by_expr_count < 8 {
Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::from(value as u8))
} else if group_by_expr_count < 16 {
Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::from(value as u16))
} else if group_by_expr_count < 32 {
Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::from(value as u32))
} else {
Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::from(value as u64))
}
};

let grouping_id_column = Expr::Column(Column::from(Aggregate::INTERNAL_GROUPING_ID));
// The grouping call is exactly our internal grouping id
if args.len() == group_by_expr_count
&& args
.iter()
.rev()
.enumerate()
.all(|(idx, expr)| group_by_expr.get(expr) == Some(&idx))
{
return Ok(cast(grouping_id_column, DataType::Int32));
}

args.iter()
.rev()
.enumerate()
.map(|(arg_idx, expr)| {
group_by_expr.get(expr).map(|group_by_idx| {
let group_by_bit =
bitwise_and(grouping_id_column.clone(), literal(1 << group_by_idx));
match group_by_idx.cmp(&arg_idx) {
Ordering::Less => {
bitwise_shift_left(group_by_bit, literal(arg_idx - group_by_idx))
}
Ordering::Greater => {
bitwise_shift_right(group_by_bit, literal(group_by_idx - arg_idx))
}
Ordering::Equal => group_by_bit,
}
})
})
.collect::<Option<Vec<_>>>()
.and_then(|bit_exprs| {
bit_exprs
.into_iter()
.reduce(bitwise_or)
.map(|expr| cast(expr, DataType::Int32))
})
.ok_or_else(|| {
internal_datafusion_err!("Grouping sets should contains at least one element")
})
}
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/explain.slt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ initial_logical_plan
02)--TableScan: simple_explain_test
logical_plan after inline_table_scan SAME TEXT AS ABOVE
logical_plan after expand_wildcard_rule SAME TEXT AS ABOVE
logical_plan after resolve_grouping_function SAME TEXT AS ABOVE
logical_plan after type_coercion SAME TEXT AS ABOVE
logical_plan after count_wildcard_rule SAME TEXT AS ABOVE
analyzed_logical_plan SAME TEXT AS ABOVE
Expand Down
Loading