Skip to content

Minor: add doc comments to ExtractEquijoinPredicate #7658

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 27, 2023

Conversation

alamb
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb commented Sep 26, 2023

Which issue does this PR close?

N/A

Rationale for this change

While reviewing #7612 it took me a while to find this optimziation and when I did so it was lacking in docs.

What changes are included in this PR?

Add docstrings

Screenshot 2023-09-26 at 7 37 52 AM

Are these changes tested?

N/A

Are there any user-facing changes?

Docs

@github-actions github-actions bot added the optimizer Optimizer rules label Sep 26, 2023
Co-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
@viirya viirya merged commit bcc2acd into apache:main Sep 27, 2023
@viirya
Copy link
Member

viirya commented Sep 27, 2023

Thank you @alamb

@alamb alamb deleted the alamb/equijoin_predicates branch September 28, 2023 16:30
Ted-Jiang pushed a commit to Ted-Jiang/arrow-datafusion that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2023
* Minor: add doc comments to `ExtractEquijoinPredicate`

* Update datafusion/optimizer/src/extract_equijoin_predicate.rs

Co-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
optimizer Optimizer rules
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants