Port tests in parquet.rs to sqllogictest

[hiltontj]

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #8206.

Rationale for this change

See #6195.

What changes are included in this PR?

• Added parquet.slt to the sqllogictest suite
• Port tests from datafusion/code/tests/sql/parquet.rs into parquet.slt:
  • parquet_query
  • parquet_with_sort_order_specified (see discussion)
  • fixed_size_binary_columns
  • window_fn_timestamp_tz
  • parquet_single_nan_schema
  • parquet_list_columns (original test is currently ignored, to be enabled with nested Parquet reader)
  • parquet_query_with_max_min

Are these changes tested?

Yes

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

[alamb]

Thank you @hiltontj -- this looks great. I had a few small comments, but otherwise 👍

[hiltontj]

The only test remaining that has not been ported over is parquet_list_columns. The test is currently ignored:

#[ignore = "Test ignored, will be enabled as part of the nested Parquet reader"]

I am not sure if the nested Parquet reader is ready and whether or not it is worth porting this over yet.

[alamb]

I am not sure if the nested Parquet reader is ready and whether or not it is worth porting this over yet.

I think it could be ported over but doing so is tricky -- I'll give it a whirl and see if I can make it happen as a follow on PR

[alamb]

Thanks again @hiltontj -- this looks great to me. Great first contribution 🏆

[alamb]

I am not sure if the nested Parquet reader is ready and whether or not it is worth porting this over yet.

I think it could be ported over but doing so is tricky -- I'll give it a whirl and see if I can make it happen as a follow on PR

#8587

[hiltontj]

Thanks again @hiltontj -- this looks great to me. Great first contribution 🏆

Much appreciated, thank you for the guidance. These .rs->.slt issues are great for getting acquainted with Datafusion. I may try to pick up one or two more.

[alamb]

https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/actions/runs/7256262186/job/19796000984?pr=8560 seems to have failed for infrastructure reasons, so merging this PR in 🚀