feat(failinject): add failinject feature #571
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #571 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 54.63% 54.66% +0.02%
===========================================
Files 671 671
Lines 78589 78612 +23
===========================================
+ Hits 42940 42973 +33
+ Misses 31981 31971 -10
Partials 3668 3668 see 20 files with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
marlonfan
changed the title
mark4z
reviewed
Sep 9, 2023
|
待 梦超 测试 |
AlexStocks
reviewed
Sep 10, 2023
mark4z
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2023
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: