Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[fix][broker] fix aging subscription accidentally when expiration time not arrive #23692

Conversation

pengxiangrui127
Copy link
Contributor

@pengxiangrui127 pengxiangrui127 commented Dec 8, 2024

Motivation

As we known, the subscription will be aging when the configuration of subscriptionExpirationTimeMinutes is positive.
The aging operation is dependent on the lastActive timestamp of subscription cursor, which only updated while consumers changing.
If broker is stable and consumer list not change, the subscriptin lastActive timestamp could be a very old time.
It may result in the subscriptin being deleted accidentally when broker suffer sudden exit and start up again.

Modifications

Update lastActive timestamp when the method of checkInactiveSubscriptions in PersistentTopic.java is invoked.

Verifying this change

  • Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

  • Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
  • The public API
  • The schema
  • The default values of configurations
  • The threading model
  • The binary protocol
  • The REST endpoints
  • The admin CLI options
  • The metrics
  • Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

  • doc
  • doc-required
  • doc-not-needed
  • doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository:

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 8, 2024

@pengxiangrui127 Please add the following content to your PR description and select a checkbox:

- [ ] `doc` <!-- Your PR contains doc changes -->
- [ ] `doc-required` <!-- Your PR changes impact docs and you will update later -->
- [ ] `doc-not-needed` <!-- Your PR changes do not impact docs -->
- [ ] `doc-complete` <!-- Docs have been already added -->

@github-actions github-actions bot added doc-label-missing doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs and removed doc-label-missing labels Dec 8, 2024
@pengxiangrui127 pengxiangrui127 changed the title [Bug][broker] fix aging subscription accidentally when expiration time not arrive [fix][broker] fix aging subscription accidentally when expiration time not arrive Dec 8, 2024
Copy link
Member

@thetumbled thetumbled left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simillar change in #21692, which has been closed.
The problem you are worried about is fixed by #22794.

@lhotari
Copy link
Member

lhotari commented Dec 9, 2024

Closing this PR since the issue is handled by #22794.

@lhotari lhotari closed this Dec 9, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants