Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[ZEPPELIN-6084] Update jena-arq to 4.10 #4886

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Reamer
Copy link
Contributor

@Reamer Reamer commented Oct 28, 2024

What is this PR for?

This PR is a follow-up to #4507.
I have decided to switch to the latest version 4.x. From 5.x JDK 17 is required. Obsolete functions have been removed.

Note: I do not use the interpreter myself. I have not tested it manually either. I rely on the unit tests.

What type of PR is it?

Improvement

What is the Jira issue?

How should this be tested?

  • CI

Questions:

  • Does the license files need to update? No
  • Is there breaking changes for older versions? Maybe
  • Does this needs documentation? No

@@ -108,6 +108,10 @@ void testSuccessfulRawQuery() {
assertEquals(Code.SUCCESS, result.code());

final String expected = "?subject\t?predicate\t?object\n" +
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apparently the sorting has been changed a little. I hope it doesn't cause any problems.

@Reamer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reamer commented Nov 7, 2024

@pjfanning Can you do a review here?

@Reamer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reamer commented Nov 12, 2024

@645775992 Can you review this PR?

@pjfanning
Copy link
Contributor

Jena is not something I know a great deal about but the changes look ok to me.

@Reamer Reamer requested a review from jongyoul November 13, 2024 07:11
@Reamer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reamer commented Nov 24, 2024

@pan3793 @jongyoul Please review.

@Reamer Reamer requested a review from pan3793 November 24, 2024 12:01
@pan3793
Copy link
Member

pan3793 commented Nov 25, 2024

It seems that the sparql interpreter does not have integration tests, I don't use sparql, so may not be able to evaluate this change. Is it possible to leverage the testcontainers to build an integration test?

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants