-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
[ZEPPELIN-6084] Update jena-arq to 4.10 #4886
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -108,6 +108,10 @@ void testSuccessfulRawQuery() { | |||
assertEquals(Code.SUCCESS, result.code()); | |||
|
|||
final String expected = "?subject\t?predicate\t?object\n" + |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apparently the sorting has been changed a little. I hope it doesn't cause any problems.
@pjfanning Can you do a review here? |
@645775992 Can you review this PR? |
Jena is not something I know a great deal about but the changes look ok to me. |
It seems that the sparql interpreter does not have integration tests, I don't use sparql, so may not be able to evaluate this change. Is it possible to leverage the testcontainers to build an integration test? |
What is this PR for?
This PR is a follow-up to #4507.
I have decided to switch to the latest version 4.x. From 5.x JDK 17 is required. Obsolete functions have been removed.
Note: I do not use the interpreter myself. I have not tested it manually either. I rely on the unit tests.
What type of PR is it?
Improvement
What is the Jira issue?
How should this be tested?
Questions: