[Core > getting started] Remove empty block quote #2022
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Removed an unnecessary empty block in the "CAUTION" section of the documentation. This change cleans up the formatting and ensures the documentation is more readable and concise.
vinceAmstoutz
deleted the
docs-improve-getting-started-with-better-caution-warning-message
branch
|
Let's merge this for now, but this looks like a bug on the MD parser of the site. IIRC the syntax with an empty line is a best practice. |
|
Any ideas on how to improve this? Should be modified on api-platform/docs-website no? |
|
Likely, yes. |
|
I've created an issue for this issue here: api-platform/docs-website#13 |
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removed an unnecessary empty block in the "CAUTION" section of the documentation. This change cleans up the formatting and ensures the documentation is more readable and concise.
While fixing this I realized that the rendering is not very nice on the doc site @dunglas.
Expected rendering (with the actual code):
But in the documentation website we have this rendering:
