Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

adds docs on using the native GitHub actions #2419

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 24, 2025
Merged

Conversation

lleadbet
Copy link
Contributor

As we've moved the GitHub Actions into a more formally supported repo (https://github.com/apollographql/rover-actions), this just updates the docs to point folks there vs. just the cURL example.

@lleadbet lleadbet requested review from a team as code owners February 23, 2025 11:41
@svc-apollo-docs
Copy link
Collaborator

svc-apollo-docs commented Feb 23, 2025

✅ Docs preview ready

The preview is ready to be viewed. View the preview

File Changes

0 new, 1 changed, 0 removed
* (developer-tools)/rover/ci-cd.mdx

Build ID: b52e04e16e419eb707960712

URL: https://www.apollographql.com/docs/deploy-preview/b52e04e16e419eb707960712

Copy link
Contributor

@Meschreiber Meschreiber left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this addition! Beyond the nits I've added as suggestions/comments, a couple of wonderings:

  1. Should we also update https://www.apollographql.com/docs/graphos/platform/schema-management/checks/github-integration?
  2. I'm wondering if the H3 orders in the H2 GitHub Actions best fits users' needs. for example, should the new Apollo-provided GitHub Actions go first, followed by [Linux/MacOS jobs using the curl installer](https://www.apollographql.com/docs/deploy-preview/8fc8083fd1146f0f092571d9/rover/ci-cd#linuxmacos-jobs-using-the-curl-installer) then [Displaying schema check results on GitHub pull requests](https://www.apollographql.com/docs/deploy-preview/8fc8083fd1146f0f092571d9/rover/ci-cd#displaying-schema-check-results-on-github-pull-requests)? Or are the following two sub-headers of [Displaying schema check results on GitHub pull requests](https://www.apollographql.com/docs/deploy-preview/8fc8083fd1146f0f092571d9/rover/ci-cd#displaying-schema-check-results-on-github-pull-requests)?

Co-authored-by: Maria Elisabeth Schreiber <maria.schreiber@apollographql.com>
@lleadbet
Copy link
Contributor Author

re:

I'm wondering if the H3 orders in the H2 GitHub Actions best fits users' needs

I think moving them to the same heading level (H3) makes the most sense, since they're all related but not nested. The GitHub app is helpful for both options, but does require a slight bit of configuration in addition to the others.

It could live below them- what do you think?

@Meschreiber Meschreiber enabled auto-merge (squash) February 24, 2025 21:32
@Meschreiber Meschreiber merged commit 632bcf8 into main Feb 24, 2025
32 checks passed
@Meschreiber Meschreiber deleted the docs/github-actions branch February 24, 2025 21:44
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants