-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 426
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
extend model arg usage in io_pymc3 to fix plot_ppc with prior #1045
Merged
+180
−62
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5a1020b
extend check_multiple attrs to assert negations
OriolAbril ad510ee
do not create observed_data if predictions are present
OriolAbril 1ef4ba8
divide prior groups using model instead of trace
OriolAbril fceccf9
add to changelog
OriolAbril c564199
type hinting and docstring extension
OriolAbril 46f9ddc
Add docstring to from_pymc3
OriolAbril 5236351
change legend in plot_ppc to match group used
OriolAbril 14994e6
pending deprecation warning
OriolAbril 8814826
black
OriolAbril 710fc23
lint
OriolAbril File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't really like leaving out the check that tells the caller why they are not getting observations out of their trace when they expect it. Perhaps replace my error with a
UserWarning
?It seems like Arviz tries to get whatever information it can out of a trace, and ignores whatever it can't figure out. This makes it relatively robust, but means that the user doesn't know that they could get more information into the
InferenceData
by providing a model.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I completely agree, I was just waiting in order to replace it with an informative warning or a deprecation warning.