-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 704
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Fix comparison comment in snowflake algorithms #3256
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yacovm
changed the title
Fix comparison comment in comment in snowflake algorithms
Fix comparison comment in snowflake algorithms
Aug 1, 2024
StephenButtolph
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2024
In the snowflake algorithms, there is the following comment: // terminationConditions[i].alphaConfidence < terminationConditions[i+1].alphaConfidence // terminationConditions[i].beta <= terminationConditions[i+1].beta However, the two lines contradict, as if alpha confidence grows with i, then beta should decrease and not increase. The reason is that the higher our confidence, the less consecutive polls we need to finalize. Signed-off-by: Yacov Manevich <yacov.manevich@avalabs.org>
yacovm
force-pushed
the
fixTypoSnowflake
branch
from
August 1, 2024 14:42
386dd30
to
32f03f9
Compare
StephenButtolph
added
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation or examples
cleanup
Code quality improvement
labels
Aug 1, 2024
aaronbuchwald
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - nice catch
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
Aug 1, 2024
🤔 I wonder if we broke the merge queue for PRs coming from forks |
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
Aug 1, 2024
it's not my first PR from a fork, maybe there could be another explanation? |
tsachiherman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 5, 2024
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Labels
cleanup
Code quality improvement
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation or examples
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why this should be merged
In the snowflake algorithms, there is the following comment:
However, the two lines contradict, as if alpha confidence grows with i, then beta should decrease and not increase. The reason is that the higher our confidence, the less consecutive polls we need to finalize.
How this works
Just a comment fix
How this was tested
No need to test, it's a comment fix.