feat(applicationsignals-alpha): introduce Application Signals L2 constructs

[bjrara]

Issue # (if applicable)

N/A

Description of changes

This PR adds L2 constructs to simplify the Application Signals enablement process. See aws/aws-cdk-rfcs#672 for more details.

Describe any new or updated permissions being added

Checklist

• My code adheres to the CONTRIBUTING GUIDE and DESIGN GUIDELINES

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.21%. Comparing base (a6bfe3c) to head (612770e).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #32931   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.21%   82.21%           
=======================================
  Files         119      119           
  Lines        6876     6876           
  Branches     1162     1162           
=======================================
  Hits         5653     5653           
  Misses       1120     1120           
  Partials      103      103           

Flag	Coverage Δ
suite.unit	82.21% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
packages/aws-cdk	∅ <ø> (∅)
packages/aws-cdk-lib/core	82.21% <ø> (ø)

[moelasmar]

@Mergifyio refresh

[mergify]

refresh

✅ Pull request refreshed

[moelasmar]

using this Managed policy violates the Apply least-privilege permissions rule of the security best practices, since as defined here, this managed policy enable multiple actions for * resources. It will be petter to add a new Policy, and add the specific resources that you need these actions to be allowed on them.

Pull request has been modified.

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR has been in the BUILD FAILING state for 3 weeks, and looks abandoned. Note that PRs with failing linting check or builds are not reviewed, please ensure your build is passing

To prevent automatic closure:

• Resume work on the PR
• OR request an exemption by adding a comment containing 'Exemption Request' with justification e.x "Exemption Request: "
• OR request clarification by adding a comment containing 'Clarification Request' with a question e.x "Clarification Request: "

This PR will automatically close in 7 days if no action is taken.

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR has been deemed to be abandoned, and will be automatically closed. Please create a new PR for these changes if you think this decision has been made in error.

[github-actions]

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.

[moelasmar]

@bjrara .. are you planning to finalize this PR ?

[bjrara]

@bjrara .. are you planning to finalize this PR ?

Yes.

[aws-cdk-automation]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
• Commit ID: 612770e
• Result: FAILED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository