Skip to content

chore(deps-dev): bump eslint to 8.x #3433

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 16, 2022
Merged

chore(deps-dev): bump eslint to 8.x #3433

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 16, 2022

Conversation

trivikr
Copy link
Member

@trivikr trivikr commented Mar 15, 2022

Issue

Preparing for upgrade to TS 4.6 in #3217

Description

Bumps eslint to 8.x, and it's dependencies.

Testing

  • Verified eslint was run on generate-clients and no code was updated.
  • Manually run the following commands:
    • yarn eslint --fix packages/**/src/**/*.ts
    • yarn eslint --fix lib/**/src/**/*.ts

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@trivikr trivikr requested a review from a team as a code owner March 15, 2022 21:37
@trivikr trivikr marked this pull request as draft March 15, 2022 21:40
@trivikr trivikr marked this pull request as ready for review March 15, 2022 21:49
@trivikr trivikr marked this pull request as draft March 15, 2022 21:55
@trivikr trivikr marked this pull request as ready for review March 16, 2022 17:37
@trivikr trivikr merged commit 4fd26e4 into aws:main Mar 16, 2022
@trivikr trivikr deleted the bump-eslint branch March 16, 2022 18:58
@github-actions
Copy link

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 31, 2022
# for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? #.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants