Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Replace embedded jsr305 dependency with OSGi bundle #1279

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

cmark
Copy link
Member

@cmark cmark commented Apr 17, 2024

No description provided.

@cmark cmark requested review from apeteri and AAAlinaaa April 17, 2024 09:54
@cmark cmark self-assigned this Apr 17, 2024
Copy link
Member

@apeteri apeteri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 48.26%. Comparing base (9fbf6f3) to head (cccc9c3).
Report is 6 commits behind head on 9.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                9.x    #1279      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     48.21%   48.26%   +0.04%     
+ Complexity    13936    13935       -1     
============================================
  Files          1947     1946       -1     
  Lines         95154    95065      -89     
  Branches      10985    10980       -5     
============================================
- Hits          45882    45879       -3     
+ Misses        46278    46191      -87     
- Partials       2994     2995       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cmark cmark merged commit 846dd20 into 9.x Apr 17, 2024
5 checks passed
@cmark cmark deleted the issue/replace-embedded-jsr305 branch April 17, 2024 11:27
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants