Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

SO-6276: Improve detection of non-connected cycles in SimpleTaxonomyGraph #1322

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

apeteri
Copy link
Member

@apeteri apeteri commented Sep 17, 2024

No description provided.

...ancestor and descendant computations (these might miss concepts that
become a separate tree by forming a cycle).
...taxonomy change processor implementation if information about the
presence of cycle is received, BadRequestException if the tree could not
be updated otherwise
@apeteri apeteri requested review from cmark and nagyo September 17, 2024 16:38
@apeteri apeteri self-assigned this Sep 17, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 70.73171% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 48.57%. Comparing base (4118d43) to head (070ba9a).
Report is 3 commits behind head on 9.x.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...l/core/taxonomy/SimpleTaxonomyChangeProcessor.java 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
...nal/snowowl/core/taxonomy/SimpleTaxonomyGraph.java 87.87% 2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                9.x    #1322   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     48.57%   48.57%           
  Complexity    14070    14070           
=========================================
  Files          1949     1949           
  Lines         95382    95406   +24     
  Branches      11025    11026    +1     
=========================================
+ Hits          46329    46343   +14     
- Misses        46020    46029    +9     
- Partials       3033     3034    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@nagyo nagyo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Member

@cmark cmark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🥓

@cmark cmark merged commit 9240139 into 9.x Sep 18, 2024
5 checks passed
@cmark cmark deleted the issue/SO-6276-lcs-parent-update-cycles branch September 18, 2024 07:40
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants