Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

SO-6377: allow multiple same type identity providers #1364

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 12, 2025

Conversation

cmark
Copy link
Member

@cmark cmark commented Feb 12, 2025

No description provided.

@cmark cmark requested review from apeteri, nagyo and AAAlinaaa February 12, 2025 15:43
@cmark cmark self-assigned this Feb 12, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.00000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 64.11%. Comparing base (32db033) to head (0721c1b).
Report is 11 commits behind head on 9.x.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...national/snowowl/core/identity/IdentityPlugin.java 60.00% 3 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                9.x    #1364   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     64.11%   64.11%           
  Complexity    12628    12628           
=========================================
  Files          1614     1614           
  Lines         57336    57338    +2     
  Branches       5638     5638           
=========================================
+ Hits          36759    36761    +2     
+ Misses        18233    18230    -3     
- Partials       2344     2347    +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cmark cmark merged commit 749bed7 into 9.x Feb 12, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@cmark cmark deleted the issue/SO-6377-allow-multiple-same-type-identity-providers branch February 12, 2025 17:59
Copy link
Member

@nagyo nagyo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🍏

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants