Hotfix: Fix exp ID generation and improve summarization log readability

[bakaburg1]

This pull request includes two commits:

1. fix: fix exp ID generation in summary tree check

2. feat: improve summarization log readability

The first commit fixes the generation of experiment IDs in the summary tree check. It ensures that the IDs are correctly generated and consistent with the titles and sessions. The previous version was causing an error when session where not used in the agenda definition.

The second commit improves the readability of the summarization log. It separates different summarised talks in the log for better clarity.

These changes enhance the functionality and user experience of the software.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent modifications enhance the codebase by improving output formatting in the summarization functionality and refining the validation process for summary tree consistency. Specifically, the output now includes a more structured format with added comments, while the validation logic has been streamlined by leveraging a new function for ID generation and simplifying error handling by removing outdated logic related to sessions.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
R/summarization.R	Added a newline character and a comment symbol to the output message in the summarise_full_meeting function.
R/validation.R	Introduced build_ids_from_agenda function for exp_ids generation, removed sessions logic, and updated error messaging for ID and title/session inconsistencies. exp_ids is now set to NULL.

🐰✨
Changes in the code, oh how they flow,
Like rivers of digits, in endless row.
A rabbit hops by, leaving tracks in the snow,
Celebrating the updates, with a soft, happy glow.
🌟📜

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e38a23e and a027b8b.

Files selected for processing (3)

• DESCRIPTION (1 hunks)
• R/summarization.R (1 hunks)
• R/validation.R (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• DESCRIPTION

Additional comments: 2

R/validation.R (1)

• 96-97: The introduction of build_ids_from_agenda for generating exp_ids and setting their names to NULL is a logical step for simplifying the ID generation process. However, ensure that the build_ids_from_agenda function is thoroughly tested, especially for edge cases where agenda items might not follow expected formats.

R/summarization.R (1)

• 389-389: Adding a newline character and a comment symbol before each talk identifier in the summarization log is a simple yet effective way to improve log readability. This change clearly segregates different talks in the log, making it easier for users to navigate and understand the summarized content.