-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
MessagePack Support? #358
Comments
This sound like a good idea, and that's 100% aligned with the philosophy of ArduinoJson. Also, it looks like there will be a lot of testing, so I'd like to see how much traction this feature gets before writing a lot of code. Let's see how many upvotes 👍 (or downvotes 👎) we get on this feature request. |
When its about...
I upvote. For me size is equally important to performance in micro controllers. |
I'd be keen on this. reducing the buffer size is great from my end! limited ram and all.. |
upvote. I want to use arduino JSON to store data on local storage, but it is not efficiently packed. Would love a way to reduce the output size. Even just storing variables in their hex format would be good. |
ArduinoJSON is miles ahead of the msgPack arduino implementation, would way rather use ArduinoJSON for this purpose. |
Branch 5.8.x seems to be quite stable now. |
@bblanchon, @mahmed8003, @cosmikwolf there's a new PR of mine that includes an initial support to messagepack: #682, if anyone could test more with an arduino I'd be glad. Thanks. |
MessagePack is finally available in ArduinoJson 6.0.0 |
Is it possible to have MessagePack support.
Instead of printing JSON string to buffer using this method
size_t prettyPrintTo(char *buffer, size_t bufferSize)
can we have another method like
size_t msgPackPrintTo(char *buffer, size_t bufferSize)
Use case:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: