Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Visual styling including equivalent of MediaWiki sidebar #3

Closed
peterjc opened this issue Apr 10, 2016 · 12 comments
Closed

Visual styling including equivalent of MediaWiki sidebar #3

peterjc opened this issue Apr 10, 2016 · 12 comments

Comments

@peterjc
Copy link
Member

peterjc commented Apr 10, 2016

i.e. Make it pretty and functional.

The last version of MediaWiki's special page MediaWiki:Sidebar was just:

      <text xml:space="preserve" bytes="505">* navigation
** Biopython|mainpage
** Download|Downloads
** Mailing lists|Mailing lists
** Documentation|Documentation
** :Category:Cookbook|Cookbook
** News|News
** SourceCode|Source Code
** https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues|New issue tracker
** http://redmine.open-bio.org/projects/biopython|Old issue tracker
** http://testing.open-bio.org/biopython/|Buildbot Tests
** participants|Participants
** scriptcentral|Script Central
** recentchanges-url|recentchanges
** randompage-url|randompage</text>

I think that boils down to easy access to:

@peterjc
Copy link
Member Author

peterjc commented Apr 11, 2016

I've got something functional using the hyde theme up and running currently.
screenshot 2016-04-11 17 26 06

@tiagoantao
Copy link
Member

cool!

@peterjc
Copy link
Member Author

peterjc commented Apr 11, 2016

Here I've reused the Biopython logo on a dark grey background which @widdowquinn prepared for the @biopython twitter banner https://twitter.com/biopython
screenshot 2016-04-11 18 02 05

Someone else may be able to prepare a transparent logo which looks good on a dark background (@widdowquinn or @MarkusPiotrowski maybe?), here I've just made the side bar use HTML color 10100F to match the image ;)

See temporary branch https://github.com/biopython/biopython.github.io/tree/hyde3 for details

@peterjc
Copy link
Member Author

peterjc commented Apr 11, 2016

I can imagine variants like the logo bottom left with the text (plus the "Biopython" text) top right. But I will leave this kind of polishing till later (and we can solicit community input)

@MarkusPiotrowski
Copy link
Contributor

Am 11.04.2016 um 19:04 schrieb Peter Cock:

Here I've reused the Biopython logo on a dark grey background which
@widdowquinn https://github.com/widdowquinn prepared for the
@biopython https://github.com/Biopython twitter banner
https://twitter.com/biopython

On Internet Explorer 11 and Firefox (both on Windows), the black
Biopython logo doesn't look so nice, it's fully blown up and thus blurred.

screenshot 2016-04-11 18 02 05
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/63959/14435401/9b4dcd16-000f-11e6-87f8-94050df7288d.png

Someone else may be able to prepare a transparent logo which looks
good on a dark background (@widdowquinn
https://github.com/widdowquinn or @MarkusPiotrowski
https://github.com/markuspiotrowski maybe?), here I've just made the
side bar use HTML color 10100F to match the image ;)

See temporary branch
https://github.com/biopython/biopython.github.io/tree/hyde3 for details

Can you try the transparent Biopython.png from my Github.io pages (in
folder images)?

Markus

@peterjc
Copy link
Member Author

peterjc commented Apr 11, 2016

@MarkusPiotrowski you should be able to take a screenshot, save it to disk, and then drag it into the GitHub comment compose window.

Mac OS X Safari and Chrome looked fine (I can try Mac Firefox tomorrow), also iOS Safari looked good (the navigation is shown as a block at the top of each page, the same as if you make your window very narrow on the desktop).

@MarkusPiotrowski
Copy link
Contributor

@peterjc I was talking about the Twitter page and the black logo there.
The biopython.github.io page is OK, on Firefox you can see that the logo
black is slightly different, on IE 11 you can't.

Am 11.04.2016 um 23:06 schrieb Peter Cock:

@MarkusPiotrowski https://github.com/MarkusPiotrowski you should be
able to take a screenshot, save it to disk, and then drag it into the
GitHub comment compose window.

Mac OS X Safari and Chrome looked fine (I can try Mac Firefox
tomorrow), also iOS Safari looked good (the navigation is shown as a
block at the top of each page, the same as if you make your window
very narrow on the desktop).


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3 (comment)


Dr. Markus Piotrowski
Privatdozent/Akademischer Rat
Lehrstuhl für Pflanzenphysiologie
ND 3/49
Universitätsstr. 150
44801 Bochum

Tel. xx49-(0)234-3224290
Fax. xx49-(0)234-3214187

http://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/pflaphy/Seiten_dt/PG_Piotrowski_d.html
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Markus.Piotrowski/Index.html

@peterjc
Copy link
Member Author

peterjc commented Apr 12, 2016

@MarkusPiotrowski Thanks for the clarification, yes, there are some artefacts on the dark grey background logo currently in use on Twitter which I cropped out when I shrunk it for the current website prototype. @widdowquinn is going to try to have another look at that for us, working from the highest resolution original we have - this file pre-crop:

biopython/biopython@1fe2001

i.e. Make a new dark background version for Twitter, and if possible transparent version(s) which looks good on both a pale/white and dark/black background which would be most useful for the new website.

@peterjc
Copy link
Member Author

peterjc commented Apr 12, 2016

New images from @widdowquinn on biopython/biopython#807 - thank you!

We might want to use them here rather than in the source code repository (in which case I can do some git magic rather than requiring you do a new pull request).

@widdowquinn
Copy link
Contributor

No worries - I'd have put them in this repo, if I'd have thought.

@peterjc
Copy link
Member Author

peterjc commented Apr 13, 2016

I'm going to mark this as close given the site is currently functional - thank all for the input so far.

@peterjc peterjc closed this as completed Apr 13, 2016
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants