-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 650
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
remove verify_account_history_plugin_index() #915
Conversation
I think we need to fix it rather than removing it. Maybe add similar tests for other plugins. |
I believe this is a Protocol Impacting Issue. If so, may I request @oxarbitrage @abitmore to Label it and place it on the proper Release (remove the incorrect one, as I assigned it to both). |
not protocol update here. what happens is that the code in question is not active in the moment so i removed it. @abitmore think the code should be fixed instead of removed. I didn't had the time to take a look on how hard to fix it yet however this is something we probably can do in the next release. |
@oxarbitrage Thanks for clarifying the Release placement. May I request you add the reference to the Issue number? I am unable to locate an Issue this fixes. |
there is no issue for this, just the pull at the moment. |
maybe we should create issue for this PR ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAICS the commented-out code checks some mapping of accounts to addresses.
That doesn't make sense at all, so I don't see how this could be fixed, therefore I approve removal.
(Feel free to disagree ofc.)
I agree. The last related commit is this: a0765e2, which removed a lot of code but left some commented out. According to changes and the commit comment, the commented out code doesn't make sense any more. |
function
verify_account_history_plugin_index()
in the test cases doreturn
immediately after it is called, ignoring the body on it fully. haves no sense to keep or use IMO(maybe i am missing something), this PR remove function and calls to it.