Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

remove verify_account_history_plugin_index() #915

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2018

Conversation

oxarbitrage
Copy link
Member

function verify_account_history_plugin_index() in the test cases do return immediately after it is called, ignoring the body on it fully. haves no sense to keep or use IMO(maybe i am missing something), this PR remove function and calls to it.

@oxarbitrage oxarbitrage added code cleanup 4a Low Priority Priority indicating minimal impact to system/user -OR- an inexpensive workaround exists labels May 11, 2018
@abitmore
Copy link
Member

I think we need to fix it rather than removing it. Maybe add similar tests for other plugins.

@ryanRfox
Copy link
Contributor

I believe this is a Protocol Impacting Issue. If so, may I request @oxarbitrage @abitmore to Label it and place it on the proper Release (remove the incorrect one, as I assigned it to both).

@oxarbitrage
Copy link
Member Author

not protocol update here. what happens is that the code in question is not active in the moment so i removed it. @abitmore think the code should be fixed instead of removed. I didn't had the time to take a look on how hard to fix it yet however this is something we probably can do in the next release.

@ryanRfox
Copy link
Contributor

@oxarbitrage Thanks for clarifying the Release placement. May I request you add the reference to the Issue number? I am unable to locate an Issue this fixes.

@oxarbitrage
Copy link
Member Author

there is no issue for this, just the pull at the moment.

@cogutvalera
Copy link
Member

maybe we should create issue for this PR ?

Copy link
Contributor

@pmconrad pmconrad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAICS the commented-out code checks some mapping of accounts to addresses.
That doesn't make sense at all, so I don't see how this could be fixed, therefore I approve removal.
(Feel free to disagree ofc.)

@abitmore
Copy link
Member

I agree. The last related commit is this: a0765e2, which removed a lot of code but left some commented out. According to changes and the commit comment, the commented out code doesn't make sense any more.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
4a Low Priority Priority indicating minimal impact to system/user -OR- an inexpensive workaround exists code cleanup testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants