Skip to content

feat: wordBoundary anchor #62

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 28, 2024
Merged

feat: wordBoundary anchor #62

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 28, 2024

Conversation

mdjastrzebski
Copy link
Member

@mdjastrzebski mdjastrzebski commented Feb 15, 2024

Summary

Implement wordBoundary anchors (as well as their negation).

Checklist

  • Implementation
  • Tests
  • API docs
  • README docs (if relevant)
  • Example docs & tests (if relevant)

Test plan

Add relevant tests.

@mdjastrzebski mdjastrzebski changed the title feat: basic wordBoundary implementations feat: wordBoundary anchor Feb 20, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.40%. Comparing base (aa585b1) to head (418fe1f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #62   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.39%   99.40%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines         165      167    +2     
  Branches       40       40           
=======================================
+ Hits          164      166    +2     
  Misses          1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mdjastrzebski mdjastrzebski marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2024 16:03
@mdjastrzebski mdjastrzebski merged commit e9b764b into main Feb 28, 2024
@mdjastrzebski mdjastrzebski deleted the feat/word-boundary branch February 28, 2024 16:25
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants