Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Simple impact searcher #1592

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 8, 2021
Merged

Conversation

MXueguang
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@MXueguang
Copy link
Member Author

for PR in pyserini, please see castorini/pyserini#684

pom.xml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/main/java/io/anserini/search/SimpleImpactSearcher.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@lintool
Copy link
Member

lintool commented Jul 5, 2021

@MXueguang is this ready for review? we need detailed tests for this since it's going to be at the core of lots of things moving forward...

@MXueguang MXueguang force-pushed the simple_impact_searcher branch from b722f3f to 7fcb705 Compare July 6, 2021 07:18
@MXueguang MXueguang marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2021 07:19
@lintool
Copy link
Member

lintool commented Jul 7, 2021

We need some tests to make sure that SearchCollection and SimpleImpactSearcher give exactly the same output. Should this be done as a regression test in pyserini?

Currently, do we get exactly the same as the uniCOIL and DeepImpact repro in Anserini?

If so, ready to merge?

@MXueguang
Copy link
Member Author

yes, ready to merge.

@lintool lintool self-requested a review July 8, 2021 11:32
@MXueguang MXueguang merged commit dad4b82 into castorini:master Jul 8, 2021
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants