Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Add known_gaps table #53

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 31, 2022
Merged

Add known_gaps table #53

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 31, 2022

Conversation

abdulrabbani00
Copy link
Contributor

We will probably need to change the modulus_block_number columns name

We will probably need to change the `modulus_block_number` columns name
@abdulrabbani00 abdulrabbani00 linked an issue Mar 18, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@abdulrabbani00 abdulrabbani00 changed the title Add known_gaps table - DO NOT MERGE YET!! Add known_gaps table Mar 30, 2022
@abdulrabbani00 abdulrabbani00 marked this pull request as ready for review March 30, 2022 21:34
Copy link
Collaborator

@i-norden i-norden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Table definition LGTM but we should add the migration as well. I agree we should change that column to modulus_block_number and we should also add another column, something like offset or slot_position. Then we can tell which blocks a specific service is handling no matter how we divide the work up (neglecting the confounding activity of the eth_probes that Rick poined out).

schema.sql Show resolved Hide resolved
@abdulrabbani00
Copy link
Contributor Author

@i-norden - My thought was that based off the processing_number, we would be able to figure out what the offset is. But I would love to understand your thoughts on the extra columns and their value.

@i-norden i-norden merged commit 82f28ae into main Mar 31, 2022
@abdulrabbani00 abdulrabbani00 deleted the feature/known_table branch March 31, 2022 17:25
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Known gap table
2 participants