-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 195
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Kube-scan - No image exist #265
Comments
This pull request removes kube-scan due to non-existing official image on dockerhub. Issue: civo#265
Just noticed that my PR is against the master branch. Is this repository using master or main as default/primary branch? Let me know and I'll redirect the PR if needed :) |
Thanks @Johannestegner for catching this issue. I don't see any active commits on there repo, don't seems to be in active development/maintenance mode. It makes sense to remove it. About the default primary branch, it seems to be master. @saiyam1814 can you confirm this? |
I actually even forked the repo and tried to build it, but there was too many issues with outdated dependencies that I finally gave up (the UI that is). Server still seems to be working, but without a UI that makes it kinda moot, hehe. Ty for the response :) |
yup its master as default, I can merge it! |
This pull request removes kube-scan due to non-existing official image on dockerhub. Issue: #265
I should have a habit of adding a fix issue number in the PR! |
This issue is a:
Bug Reports
The kube-scan image from octarinesec does no longer exist on docker hub. Their company webpage redirects to VMWare, so I'm guessing that they where bought up and the kube-scan software was removed from dockerhub.
For now, I would recommend that we just remove kube-scan until there is a signed and controlled image available (I could provide one later today if needed, while it would be great if we could have an official and maintained image instead).
When using the kube-scan marketplace application, the pod is stuck in a image-pull-backoff state forever, as there is no image.
@milindchawre , as you submitted the application you have more a say in this than me, so feel free to do any changes you wish! I will leave a PR with it removed for now though, in case that is the solution that Civo feel is the best at the moment! :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: