Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

feat(clerk-js): Support collecting optional fields in combined flow #4795

Conversation

alexcarpenter
Copy link
Member

Description

When in a combined flow and there are optional fields, move to create step vs moving the verify email to be able to collect the optional fields during the flow.

Resolves SDKI-809

Checklist

  • pnpm test runs as expected.
  • pnpm build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 17, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandbox ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 17, 2024 8:47pm

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 17, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 2d3c405

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 3 packages
Name Type
@clerk/clerk-js Patch
@clerk/chrome-extension Patch
@clerk/clerk-expo Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@alexcarpenter alexcarpenter merged commit fbb9e0d into main Dec 17, 2024
29 checks passed
@alexcarpenter alexcarpenter deleted the alexcarpenter/sdki-809-support-collecting-optional-fields-on-sign-up branch December 17, 2024 22:06
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants