add a test workflow for testing the new @hltScouting DQM sequence in ScoutingPFMonitor dataset

[mmusich]

fixes #47315

PR description:

Title says it all

PR validation:

runTheMatrix.py -l 145.415 -t 4 -j 8 runs fine.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

N/A

[mmusich]

test parameters:

• workflow = 145.415

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-47327/43654

[cmsbuild]

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 76KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c1db4f/44332/summary.html
COMMIT: 76fee0d
CMSSW: CMSSW_15_1_X_2025-02-11-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/47327/44332/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 2 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4019507
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 21
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4019466
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
• Checked 218 log files, 189 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[silviodonato]

In the DQM file of the PR test I see the scouting DQM folders as expected
.

I'm just realizing that we should keep also the standard DQM in ScoutingPFMonitor, so
HARVESTING:@hltScouting -->
HARVESTING:@standardDQM+@miniAODDQM+@nanoAODDQM+@hltScouting

DQM:@rerecoZeroBias+@miniAODDQM+@nanoAODDQM -->
DQM:@standardDQM+@miniAODDQM+@nanoAODDQM+@hltScouting

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (upgrade, pdmv)

@AdrianoDee, @Moanwar, @DickyChant, @miquork, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @fabiocos, @makortel, @missirol, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mmusich]

@silviodonato, like this?

[silviodonato]

Yes, I think so

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-47327/43669

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #47327 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @Moanwar, @cmsbuild, @DickyChant, @miquork, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please check and sign again.

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 68KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c1db4f/44360/summary.html
COMMIT: 253e316
CMSSW: CMSSW_15_1_X_2025-02-12-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/47327/44360/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 1 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 12 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3905420
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 27
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3905373
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 214 log files, 184 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[AdrianoDee]

+pdmv

[Moanwar]

+Upgrade

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[mandrenguyen]

+1