Skip to content

Using JDK 16 GA instead of JDK 16 EA #147

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2021
Merged

Using JDK 16 GA instead of JDK 16 EA #147

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2021

Conversation

mkarg
Copy link
Collaborator

@mkarg mkarg commented Apr 3, 2021

Since JDK 16 is generally available it makes no sense to use an early access build anybody.

@mkarg mkarg added the github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code label Apr 3, 2021
@mkarg mkarg requested a review from hboutemy April 3, 2021 08:49
@mkarg mkarg self-assigned this Apr 3, 2021
@olamy
Copy link
Member

olamy commented Apr 4, 2021

jdk16 build is failing, So I remove until the build is fixed with java16
it's just weird to have a check failing

Since JDK 16 is generally available it makes no sense to use an early access build anybody.
@slachiewicz
Copy link
Member

it was fixed by 6f11ee1 - after rebase everythign is green

@slachiewicz slachiewicz merged commit 7aff941 into master Apr 12, 2021
@slachiewicz slachiewicz deleted the mkarg-jdk-16 branch April 12, 2021 16:34
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants