Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Add /block idempotency requirement #26

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2020

Conversation

matheusd
Copy link
Contributor

This adds a requirement that all calls to the /block endpoint be
idempotent when identifying a block by hash.

This ensures blocks are inalterable and clients can safely assume that
once they've received a specific block from a Rosetta implementation
that block won't change.

The discussion that prompted this is here

Copy link
Contributor

@patrick-ogrady patrick-ogrady left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

This adds a requirement that all calls to the /block endpoint be
idempotent when identifying a block by hash.

This ensures blocks are inalterable and clients can safely assume that
once they've received a specific block from a Rosetta implementation
that block won't change.
@matheusd matheusd force-pushed the inalterable-blocks branch from f87217c to d909dc6 Compare July 23, 2020 18:27
@patrick-ogrady patrick-ogrady merged commit a3a6607 into coinbase:master Jul 23, 2020
@matheusd matheusd deleted the inalterable-blocks branch July 27, 2020 15:18
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants