Feat/support remix auth oauth2 v2 #1
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@coji has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 42 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve multiple updates across various configuration files and code implementations. Key modifications include the removal of the ESLint configuration file, updates to GitHub Actions workflows to utilize newer action versions and a different Node.js version, and the introduction of a new configuration file for the Biome tool. Additionally, there are updates to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
README.md (1)
30-37: LGTM! Consider adding migration instructions.The parameter name changes follow better conventions:
clientId: Follows JavaScript/TypeScript camelCase conventionsredirectURI: Aligns with OAuth2 specification terminologySince these are breaking changes (v3.0.0), consider adding a "Migration Guide" section to help users upgrade from v2.x.x. Example:
## Migration from v2.x.x to v3.x.x The following configuration parameters have been renamed: - `clientID` → `clientId` - `callbackURL` → `redirectURI` Update your configuration object accordingly: ```diff let googleStrategy = new GoogleStrategy( { - clientID: 'YOUR_CLIENT_ID', + clientId: 'YOUR_CLIENT_ID', clientSecret: 'YOUR_CLIENT_SECRET', - callbackURL: 'https://example.com/auth/google/callback', + redirectURI: 'https://example.com/auth/google/callback', }, async ({ accessToken, refreshToken, extraParams, profile }) => { // ... } )</blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/index.ts (1)</summary><blockquote> Line range hint `168-174`: **Consider simplifying the scope parsing logic further.** While the current implementation is correct, it could be made more concise using a ternary operator. Here's a suggested optimization: ```diff private parseScope(scope: GoogleStrategyOptions['scope']) { - if (!scope) { - return GoogleStrategyDefaultScopes - } - if (Array.isArray(scope)) { - return scope.join(GoogleStrategyScopeSeperator) - } - return scope + return !scope + ? GoogleStrategyDefaultScopes + : Array.isArray(scope) + ? scope.join(GoogleStrategyScopeSeperator) + : scope }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- .eslintrc.js (0 hunks)
- .github/workflows/bump.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/main.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/publish.yml (1 hunks)
- .husky/pre-commit (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- biome.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (3 hunks)
- src/index.ts (6 hunks)
- tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .eslintrc.js
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .husky/pre-commit
- biome.json
🔇 Additional comments (14)
tsconfig.json (2)
5-6: LGTM! Modern module configuration benefits package exports.The switch to
"moduleResolution": "Bundler"and"module": "ESNext"is a good modernization that will:
- Better handle package exports
- Support the latest module syntax
- Work well with bundler-based development
3-3: LGTM! Verify Node.js compatibility with ES2022.The upgrade to ES2022 for both
libandtargetis appropriate and will enable modern JavaScript features. This aligns well with contemporary web development practices.Also applies to: 7-7
✅ Verification successful
ES2022 upgrade is safe with current dependencies
The package's dependencies indicate modern tooling compatibility:
- TypeScript 5.6.3
- Remix dependencies at ^2.13.1
- React 18.3.1
These versions fully support ES2022 features. While there's no explicit Node.js engine requirement, the peer dependencies versions implicitly require a Node.js version that supports ES2022.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Node.js version compatibility with ES2022 features # Expect: Node.js version >= 16.0.0 in package.json engines field rg -A 1 '"engines":\s*{' package.jsonLength of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a simpler pattern to find Node.js version requirements rg '"engines"' package.json # Also check for package.json content directly cat package.json | grep -A 5 '"engines"' # Backup: Let's look at the entire package.json cat package.jsonLength of output: 1548
.github/workflows/publish.yml (2)
11-12: LGTM! Good practice updating to latest action versions.Updating to v4 for both actions/checkout and actions/setup-node brings security improvements and better performance.
14-14: Verify Node.js version compatibility.The upgrade to Node.js 20 is a good proactive change as Node.js 18 approaches EOL. However, let's verify compatibility with package dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Node.js 20 upgrade is compatible with dependencies
The upgrade to Node.js 20 is safe as:
- No explicit Node.js version constraints are defined in package.json
- The main dependency @remix-run/node requires Node.js >=18.0.0, which is compatible with Node.js 20
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check package.json for Node.js version constraints and potential compatibility issues # Test 1: Check engines field in package.json echo "Checking Node.js version constraints in package.json..." jq '.engines?.node' package.json # Test 2: Look for any explicit Node.js version requirements in dependencies echo "Checking dependencies for Node.js version requirements..." jq '.dependencies, .devDependencies' package.json | rg -i "node.*[0-9]+"Length of output: 392
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the specific version requirements for @remix-run/node echo "Checking @remix-run/node package requirements..." curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@remix-run/node/2.13.1 | jq '.engines' # Also check for any build scripts or configuration files that might have Node.js requirements echo -e "\nChecking for Node.js version references in build/config files..." rg -l "node" --type yaml --type json --type jsLength of output: 439
.github/workflows/bump.yml (1)
22-22: LGTM! Good upgrade to Node.js 20.The upgrade to Node.js 20 (LTS) is a good choice and maintains consistency with other workflows in the repository.
.github/workflows/main.yml (2)
11-11: LGTM! Good upgrade to actions/checkout@v4.The upgrade from v2 to v4 brings security improvements and better performance.
Also applies to: 29-29, 47-47
13-16: Verify Node.js 20 compatibility with project dependencies.While upgrading to Node.js 20 (LTS) and actions/setup-node@v4 is good practice, please ensure all project dependencies are compatible with Node.js 20.
Let's verify the Node.js version compatibility:
Also applies to: 31-34, 49-52
✅ Verification successful
Node.js 20 compatibility check completed - no compatibility issues detected
Based on the package.json analysis:
- No specific Node.js engine requirements are defined
- All direct dependencies are recent versions that support Node.js 20:
- Remix framework (v2.13.1+)
- React (v18.3.1)
- TypeScript (v5.6.3)
- Other development tools (@biomejs/biome, prettier, etc.)
The absence of engine constraints in package.json and package-lock.json, combined with the modern versions of core dependencies, suggests the project should work well with Node.js 20.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check package.json for potential Node.js 20 compatibility issues # Test: Check if package.json specifies Node.js engine requirements echo "Checking Node.js engine requirements..." if [ -f package.json ]; then jq '.engines.node' package.json fi # Test: Look for dependencies that might have Node.js version constraints echo "Checking for dependencies with potential Node.js version constraints..." if [ -f package.json ]; then jq '.dependencies, .devDependencies' package.json fiLength of output: 705
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the package-lock.json for more detailed dependency information echo "Checking package-lock.json for dependency details..." if [ -f package-lock.json ]; then # Extract engines info from all dependencies jq -r '.. | select(.engines?) | select(.engines != null) | [path[-1], .engines] | @json' package-lock.json fi # Let's also check for any potential Node.js version-related issues in the codebase echo "Checking for Node.js version-specific code patterns..." rg -i "(?:node|process)\.version" --type js --type ts -C 2Length of output: 325
package.json (4)
23-25: LGTM: Author and repository information updated consistentlyThe author information and repository URL have been properly updated to reflect the new package ownership.
Also applies to: 28-28
56-57: LGTM: Consistent use of pnpmThe lint-staged configuration properly uses pnpm, maintaining consistency with the project's package manager choice.
38-40: Verify TypeScript 5.x compatibilityThe upgrade to TypeScript 5.x (^5.6.3) may require code changes to handle breaking changes. Also, ensure all peer dependencies are properly documented in the README.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential TypeScript compatibility issues # Test 1: Look for TypeScript configuration echo "Checking TypeScript configuration..." fd -t f "tsconfig.json" # Test 2: Check for any strict TypeScript compiler options echo "Checking TypeScript compiler options..." rg '"strict"|"strictNullChecks"|"strictFunctionTypes"' "tsconfig.json"Also applies to: 43-53
10-10: Verify Biome configurationThe switch from ESLint to Biome requires proper configuration to maintain code quality standards.
Also applies to: 12-12
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Biome configuration.
Let me check the content of the biome.json file to verify the configuration.
Biome configuration is properly set up
The biome.json file is present and well-configured with:
- Recommended linting rules enabled
- Git integration for VCS
- Additional strict rule for async/await usage
- Latest schema version referenced
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Biome configuration exists and includes necessary rules # Test: Check for biome configuration file echo "Checking for Biome configuration..." fd -t f "biome.json"Length of output: 300
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for biome configuration in package.json and any biome files echo "Checking for Biome configuration in package.json..." rg '"biome":|"@biomejs"' package.json echo -e "\nChecking for any Biome related files..." fd -t f 'biome' echo -e "\nChecking for ESLint configuration files to verify complete migration..." fd -t f '\.eslint'Length of output: 454
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "Checking Biome configuration content..." cat biome.jsonLength of output: 453
src/index.ts (3)
Line range hint
88-111: LGTM: Constructor changes improve code organization.The constructor changes properly reflect the type updates and improve code organization by initializing the scope during construction.
138-146: Enhanced token handling with full OAuth2 token information.The updated signature provides access to the complete token information, making the implementation more flexible and type-safe. The change from
accessTokenstring to fulltokensobject aligns better with OAuth2 standards.
14-16: Property renames align with Google OAuth2 v2 standards.The renaming of
clientIDtoclientIdandcallbackURLtoredirectURIbetter matches Google's OAuth2 v2 documentation. However, this is a breaking change that will require updates in consuming code.Let's verify the usage of these properties across the codebase:
.github/workflows/bump.yml
Outdated
| @@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ jobs: | |||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |||
| steps: | |||
| - name: Check out source | |||
| uses: actions/checkout@v2 | |||
| uses: actions/checkout@v3 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider upgrading to actions/checkout@v4.
Other workflow files in the repository are using actions/checkout@v4. For consistency and to benefit from the latest improvements and security fixes, consider upgrading this workflow to use v4 as well.
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
+ uses: actions/checkout@v4📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| uses: actions/checkout@v3 | |
| uses: actions/checkout@v4 |
.github/workflows/bump.yml
Outdated
| with: | ||
| ssh-key: ${{ secrets.DEPLOY_KEY }} | ||
| - name: Setup Node.js | ||
| uses: actions/setup-node@v2 | ||
| uses: actions/setup-node@v3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider upgrading to actions/setup-node@v4.
Other workflow files in the repository are using actions/setup-node@v4. For consistency and to benefit from the latest improvements and security fixes, consider upgrading this workflow to use v4 as well.
- uses: actions/setup-node@v3
+ uses: actions/setup-node@v4📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| uses: actions/setup-node@v3 | |
| uses: actions/setup-node@v4 |
| "name": "@coji/remix-auth-google", | ||
| "version": "3.0.0", | ||
| "type": "module", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Breaking changes are not properly documented for v3.0.0
The major version bump (2.0.0 → 3.0.0) and package type change ("type": "module") suggest breaking changes, but:
- No CHANGELOG.md exists
- README.md lacks migration guide or breaking changes section
- No breaking change information in recent commit messages
Please document the following changes:
- Package name change to
@coji/remix-auth-google - Impact of
"type": "module"on imports - Any API or behavior changes in v3.0.0
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify breaking changes documentation for v3.0.0
The major version bump (2.0.0 → 3.0.0) and package name change (@coji/remix-auth-google) indicate breaking changes. Additionally, "type": "module" may affect how the package is imported.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if breaking changes are documented
# Test 1: Look for CHANGELOG.md
echo "Checking for CHANGELOG.md..."
fd -t f "CHANGELOG.md"
# Test 2: Check README.md for migration guide
echo "Checking README.md for migration guide..."
rg -i "migration|upgrade|breaking.?changes" "README.md"
Length of output: 238
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if README.md exists and examine its content for any version-related information
echo "Checking README.md content..."
if [ -f "README.md" ]; then
cat README.md
fi
# Let's also check for any commit messages that might document breaking changes
echo -e "\nChecking recent commit messages for breaking change information..."
git log --grep="breaking" --grep="BREAKING" -i --max-count=5
# Check package.json diff for hints about breaking changes
echo -e "\nChecking git diff of package.json..."
git diff HEAD^1 package.json
Length of output: 2467
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/main.yml (1)
17-17: Excellent migration to pnpm with proper caching!The transition to pnpm with caching configuration is beneficial:
- Faster installation times
- Better disk space efficiency
- Proper caching configuration will speed up CI runs
Consider adding a
pnpm-lock.yamlcheck job to ensure lock file consistency across the team.Also applies to: 36-36, 55-55, 20-20, 39-39, 58-58
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/bump.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/main.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/publish.yml (1 hunks)
- CONTRIBUTING.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
CONTRIBUTING.md
[style] ~8-~8: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: .... Run the tests withpnpm run test. Run the linter withpnpm run lint. Run t...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~10-~10: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ... Run the linter withpnpm run lint. Run the typechecker with `pnpm run typechec...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/publish.yml (1)
11-14: LGTM! Good updates to the latest stable versions.The updates to actions/checkout@v4, actions/setup-node@v4, and Node.js 20 are good improvements:
- These are the latest stable versions
- Node.js 20 is the current LTS version
- The v4 actions include security improvements and better performance
.github/workflows/bump.yml (3)
16-19: LGTM! The checkout action has been upgraded to v4.The upgrade addresses the previous review comment and aligns with best practices.
27-28: Verify the migration from yarn to pnpm.The switch from yarn to pnpm for package management looks good, but let's ensure all necessary files are updated for consistency.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify complete migration from yarn to pnpm # Check for any remaining yarn-related files echo "Checking for yarn-related files:" fd -H "yarn.lock|.yarnrc|.yarn" # Check for pnpm setup files echo -e "\nVerifying pnpm setup:" fd -H "pnpm-lock.yaml|.pnpmrc" # Check other workflow files for package manager consistency echo -e "\nChecking other workflow files for package manager references:" rg -l "yarn|npm" .github/workflows/Also applies to: 35-35
21-24: Verify Node.js version compatibility.The upgrade to Node.js 20 and setup-node@v4 looks good, but let's verify compatibility with project dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Node.js 20 upgrade is compatible with project dependencies
The verification shows that:
- No Node.js version constraints are specified in package.json
- All GitHub workflows consistently use Node.js 20
- Project uses modern dependencies that are compatible with Node.js 20:
- TypeScript 5.6.3
- Remix v2.13.1
- React 18.3.1
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check package.json for any potential Node.js version constraints # that might conflict with Node.js 20 # Look for engine constraints in package.json echo "Checking for Node.js version constraints:" jq -r '.engines.node // "No engine constraint found"' package.json # Look for dependencies that might have Node.js version requirements echo -e "\nChecking dependencies for potential Node.js version constraints:" rg -l "engines.*node" node_modules/*/package.json 2>/dev/null || echo "No explicit version constraints found in dependencies"Length of output: 571
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check package.json for Node.js version constraints and other relevant configurations if [ -f "package.json" ]; then echo "Content of package.json:" cat package.json fi # Check if there are any .nvmrc or .node-version files echo -e "\nChecking for Node version files:" fd -H '\.nvmrc|\.node-version' # Look for Node.js version references in workflow files echo -e "\nNode.js version references in workflows:" rg -i 'node-version' .github/workflows/Length of output: 2086
.github/workflows/main.yml (3)
11-11: Excellent update to latest GitHub Actions versions!Updating to
actions/checkout@v4andactions/setup-node@v4is a good practice as it:
- Includes security updates
- Provides better performance
- Offers new features and bug fixes
Also applies to: 14-14, 30-30, 33-33, 49-49, 52-52
16-16: Good choice upgrading to Node.js 20!Node.js 20 is the latest LTS version, offering:
- Better performance
- New JavaScript features
- Security improvements
Also applies to: 35-35, 54-54
23-23: Verify pnpm scripts configurationThe workflow now uses pnpm for running scripts.
Let's verify the script commands are properly defined in package.json:
Also applies to: 42-42, 61-61, 64-64
✅ Verification successful
All required pnpm scripts are properly configured ✅
The verification confirms that all necessary scripts (
build,typecheck, andlint) are correctly defined in package.json, matching the workflow requirements.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all required scripts are defined in package.json # Expected: Should find "build", "typecheck", and "lint" scripts jq -r '.scripts | keys[]' package.json | grep -E '^(build|typecheck|lint)$'Length of output: 98
| cache: 'pnpm' | ||
| - run: pnpm install | ||
| - run: pnpm build | ||
| - run: pnpm publish --access public |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing pnpm lock file and setup instructions
The verification reveals two issues that need to be addressed:
- The
pnpm-lock.yamlfile is missing from the repository - Neither README.md nor CONTRIBUTING.md contain any development environment setup instructions for pnpm
Required actions:
- Generate and commit the
pnpm-lock.yamlfile - Add development setup instructions to README.md or CONTRIBUTING.md, including:
- pnpm installation requirements
- Steps to install dependencies using pnpm
- Build and development commands
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify pnpm setup in the development environment.
The switch to pnpm and addition of caching is a good modernization. However, ensure that:
- The
pnpm-lock.yamlfile is committed to the repository - The development environment setup instructions in README are updated for pnpm
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify pnpm setup
# Check if pnpm-lock.yaml exists
if [ ! -f "pnpm-lock.yaml" ]; then
echo "Warning: pnpm-lock.yaml is missing"
fi
# Check if README mentions pnpm
rg -i 'pnpm|package manager' README.md
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify more thoroughly
# Check if pnpm-lock.yaml exists and show warning if missing
if [ ! -f "pnpm-lock.yaml" ]; then
echo "pnpm-lock.yaml is missing"
fi
# Check if package.json exists and show its content
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
echo "Content of package.json:"
cat package.json
fi
# Look for any setup or installation instructions in README.md
if [ -f "README.md" ]; then
echo "Content of README.md:"
cat README.md
fi
# Check for any documentation files that might contain setup instructions
fd -t f -e md
Length of output: 3756
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores