R4R: Change swagger host for online API requests

[fedekunze]

Closes #2948

• Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)

• Linked to github-issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.

• Wrote tests

• Updated relevant documentation (docs/)

• Added entries in PENDING.md with issue #

• rereviewed Files changed in the github PR explorer

---

For Admin Use:

• Added appropriate labels to PR (ex. wip, ready-for-review, docs)
• Reviewers Assigned
• Squashed all commits, uses message "Merge pull request #XYZ: [title]" (coding standards)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3229 into develop will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3229      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    54.86%   54.85%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          133      133              
  Lines         9554     9556       +2     
===========================================
  Hits          5242     5242              
- Misses        3990     3992       +2     
  Partials       322      322

[jackzampolin]

I don't know if we want to expose a service on a domain not controlled by the company for this. cc @greg-szabo @mircea-c

[fedekunze]

I can change it to the voyager node, would that be better ?

[jackzampolin]

That would be better...

[mircea-c]

We should not expose a service on a URL we don't control. That would fail any security audit.

Voyager node works.

[alexanderbez]

@mircea-c do you have a specific host we can use or does fabo.interblock.io work?

[mircea-c]

@alexanderbez that host is the Voyager node. It works for me 😸

[alexanderbez]

LGTM 👍