Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Create codeql.yml reusable workflow #19

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

shenxianpeng
Copy link
Contributor

It's more and more common to use tools to discover vulnerabilities like CodeQL, Polaris, etc.

For projects on GitHub, CodeQL should be the first choice because it's free to research and open source.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 26, 2024
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng changed the title Create codeql-analysis.yml Create codeql.yml reusable workflow Feb 26, 2024
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng marked this pull request as ready for review February 26, 2024 09:22
@2bndy5
Copy link
Contributor

2bndy5 commented Feb 26, 2024

Have you tested this? Is it copied from a template?

I'm curious about the C++ support, particularly how CodeQL determines the C++ project's build process (and how it understands what any third-party dependencies are).

@shenxianpeng
Copy link
Contributor Author

shenxianpeng commented Feb 26, 2024

It copied from my blog repo which uses javascript language. I will test this workflow using the language Python.

Maybe this page can answer your question :)

Copy link
Contributor

@2bndy5 2bndy5 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@shenxianpeng
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tested with PR cpp-linter/cpp-linter-hooks#34 and this workflow works fine.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng merged commit aca18df into main Feb 27, 2024
1 check passed
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng deleted the add-codeql-workflow branch February 27, 2024 14:55
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants