Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom

feature gate rand #277

Closed
burdges opened this issue Aug 7, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

feature gate rand #277

burdges opened this issue Aug 7, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@burdges
Copy link
Contributor

burdges commented Aug 7, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Is there much reason to feature gate methods that depend upon big crates like rand?

Edit: Issue accidentally submitted before really considering it..
@burdges burdges closed this as completed Aug 7, 2019
@burdges burdges changed the title feature gate digest feature gate rand Aug 7, 2019
pinkforest pushed a commit to pinkforest/curve25519-dalek that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2023
@rozbb
Impl VerifyingKey::is_weak (dalek-cryptography#277)
5190ad6 
* Implemented VerifyingKey::is_weak

* Added unit test for VerifyingKey::is_weak
pinkforest added a commit to pinkforest/curve25519-dalek that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2023
@rozbb @pinkforest
README changes for 2.0 (dalek-cryptography#275)
783b6e8 
* Added items to changelog for 2.0 release

* Removed unnecessary uses of std in doctests

* Gated `Context` behind `digest`

* Fixed noncompiling doctest when only `digest` is enabled

* README feature flag list mostly done

* Copied changelog to readme

* Redid the malleability section in README

* Added CONTRIBUTING.md

* Bumped version number to 2.0.0-pre.0; small changes to README

* Updated changelog for dalek-cryptography#277

* Added pem feature description

Co-authored-by: pinkforest(she/her) <36498018+pinkforest@users.noreply.github.com>
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@burdges