-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
#1 Implement _check #2316
#1 Implement _check #2316
Conversation
Thank you for the submission, @natainakata! I'll review your code shortly, hang tight. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
Thanks for your contribution @natainakata!
Your code style completely follows the style guide. Nice job!
All the tests are passing. Nice job!
🎉 You did it! 🎉You're an open source contributor now! Whether this was your first pull request, or you’re just looking for new ways to contribute, I hope you’re inspired to take action. Don't forget to say thanks when a maintainer puts effort into helping you, even if a contribution doesn't get accepted. Open source is made by people like you: one issue, pull request, comment, and +1 at a time. What's next?Find your next project:
Learn from other great community members:
Elevate your Git game:
Questions? Comments? Concerns?I'm always open to feedback. If you had a good time with the exercise, or found some room for improvement, please email me. Want to start over? Just delete your fork. |
Hello, We have implemented exports._check().
Description
The type checking process implemented in the four arithmetic functions has been moved to _check().
Testing
Since _check() was implemented, describe.skip() was changed to describe() and the test was run.
The test passed.