-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Canary tw implementation #8808
Canary tw implementation #8808
Conversation
Jenkins results:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Logic looks good. But as usual I'd like to have a few one-line comments which explain the logic to the unaware reader.
Please test on preprod first.
Jenkins results:
|
Jenkins results:
|
Jenkins results:
|
Jenkins results:
|
Jenkins results:
|
Jenkins results:
|
Jenkins results:
|
Jenkins results:
|
Jenkins results:
|
@belforte Tested on preprod. See task
And the task ran on canary crab-preprod-tw02
For the test we had set canary_fraction as 1 so that it certainly goes to canary. It will be set to a small number like 0.05 by default in master TW config. |
I suggest to put in preprod with at 30% fraction and on monday enable at low rate in prod |
Preprod set to 0.3 in here Ok to merge? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am afraid that polling cycle is disrupted (at least happens w/o sleep) in canary. Please look at it. And in any case check what is happening.
Then I made a few "style" comments about making it more clean and readable, please change in case you agree.
Jenkins results:
|
Jenkins results:
|
Implementation of canary TW for #8806
Also see corresponding changes in https://gitlab.cern.ch/ai/it-puppet-hostgroup-vocmsglidein/-/merge_requests/292