Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

github(summary): build record upload optional #394

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024

Conversation

crazy-max
Copy link
Member

@crazy-max crazy-max commented Jul 2, 2024

@crazy-max crazy-max force-pushed the summary-without-upload branch 2 times, most recently from 7c001b7 to 2a1a1c9 Compare July 2, 2024 08:09
@crazy-max crazy-max marked this pull request as ready for review July 2, 2024 08:31
src/github.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +260 to +261
// Feedback survey
sum.addRaw(`<p>`).addRaw(`Find this useful? `).addRaw(addLink('Let us know', 'https://docs.docker.com/feedback/gha-build-summary')).addRaw('</p>');
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What if we moved this to the end? The inputs and bake def are collapsed by default, so it should still be visible. There's something odd about having this question appear right before the summary.

Copy link
Member Author

@crazy-max crazy-max Jul 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed but needs to consider the table can be quite huge if building many targets with bake like

image

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but this one is a bit of a special case, right? Do people tend to build more than ~5 or so targets in a run?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes indeed, WDYT @colinhemmings?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would like @sharonchang1 input, but I feel like to help discovery it should be close to the top. Users are likely to expand Inputs and definitions to see what they look like, pushing the link down the page.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@colinhemmings Agreed, maybe right after the table then? We can look at this as follow-up as well.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if they expand the sections and look at the summary, would they scroll back up later to give feedback?

Signed-off-by: CrazyMax <1951866+crazy-max@users.noreply.github.com>
@crazy-max crazy-max force-pushed the summary-without-upload branch from 2a1a1c9 to b26af9f Compare July 2, 2024 09:04
@crazy-max crazy-max merged commit 55a2181 into docker:main Jul 2, 2024
38 checks passed
@crazy-max crazy-max deleted the summary-without-upload branch July 2, 2024 13:11
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants