Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Make full source build pure NetCurrent #76640

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

Make full source build pure NetCurrent #76640

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

jaredpar
Copy link
Member

@jaredpar jaredpar commented Jan 6, 2025

For a full source build there should be no need for $(NetPrevious) to be included. Having it there creates complications in the build as we end up depending on projects that are not built during source build.

@jaredpar jaredpar requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2025 18:23
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added Area-Infrastructure untriaged Issues and PRs which have not yet been triaged by a lead labels Jan 6, 2025
@jaredpar
Copy link
Member Author

jaredpar commented Jan 6, 2025

@dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure PTAL
@ViktorHofer FYI


- Build Tools: requires us to ship compilers on `net472`
- .NET SDK: requires us to ship compilers on current servicing target framework (presently `net8.0`)
- Source build: requires us to ship `$(NetCurrent)` and `$(NetPrevious)` in workspaces and below (presently `net9.0` and `net8.0` respectively)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems this is no longer true?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Split this out into both repo and full source build discussion

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Area-Infrastructure untriaged Issues and PRs which have not yet been triaged by a lead
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants