Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[release/9.0-staging] [debugger] Support step into a tail call #110438

Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Backport of #110334 to release/9.0-staging

/cc @thaystg

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

#110441
A customer ships a compiler that uses tail calls and when their customers are debugging the app generated by this compiler and try to step into a tail call it behaves like a resume.

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

It works before .NET 6.

Testing

We manually tested using this internal test https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/e99557baffbe864d624cc1c95c9cbf2eefae684f/src/tests/JIT/Regression/JitBlue/Runtime_39581/Runtime_39581.il and trying to step into the Callee.

Risk

Low risk, this will only affect the scenarios where we emit a tail call using the StoreTailCallArgs, which is not used a lot. As far as I understood it's impossible to generate it from a C# code, only F# and IL.

Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @tommcdon
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@tommcdon tommcdon added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Dec 5, 2024
Addressing Tom's and Mikelle's comments

Removing unrelated change and adding enum

Changing the comment.
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the backport/pr-110334-to-release/9.0-staging branch from 306002e to cf2be04 Compare December 5, 2024 14:49
@teo-tsirpanis teo-tsirpanis modified the milestones: 9.0.0, 9.0.x Dec 5, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. we will take for consideration in 9.0.x

@thaystg
Copy link
Member

thaystg commented Dec 9, 2024

Approved by email.

@thaystg thaystg added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Dec 9, 2024
@thaystg
Copy link
Member

thaystg commented Dec 11, 2024

/ba-g Build analysis blocked by #110517

@thaystg thaystg merged commit 454fffd into release/9.0-staging Dec 11, 2024
87 of 89 checks passed
@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT modified the milestones: 9.0.x, 9.0.2 Dec 11, 2024
@jkotas jkotas deleted the backport/pr-110334-to-release/9.0-staging branch December 29, 2024 15:49
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 29, 2025
# for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? #.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants