[9.0] Backport labeling workflow changes #112240
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t` instead (dotnet#112161) * Change workflows to use pull_request_target instead of pull_request event * Add CODEOWNERS entry * Add initial readme
* Condition labeling workflows to only run on dotnet/runtime. * Improve readme * Add jeffhandley as explicit workflow owner Co-authored-by: Jeff Handley <jeffhandley@users.noreply.github.com>
carlossanlop
added
Servicing-approved
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure |
jeffhandley
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2025
carlossanlop
added
Servicing-approved
carlossanlop
commented
Feb 11, 2025
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
cc @jeffhandley
Backporting #112169 and #112161
Infra only, tell-mode.
Backporting to the release/9.0 branch so it can flow to release/9.0-staging automatically at any time.
I discussed the functionality with @jeffhandley via chat, and we should not expect the pull_request_target change to work in this PR at the moment. It will start working after this is merged.