Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Eliminate DACCESS_COMPILE from gc.cpp and gcpriv.h #57607

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2021

Conversation

cshung
Copy link
Member

@cshung cshung commented Aug 17, 2021

It appears to me that DACCESS_COMPILE is never defined on gc.cpp and gcpriv.h. Eliminate them from the files to simplify things.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 17, 2021

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Do not merge - this is an experiment only

Author: cshung
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-GC-coreclr

Milestone: -

@cshung cshung changed the title Experiment only Eliminate DACCESS_COMPILE from gc.cpp and gcpriv.h Aug 19, 2021
@cshung cshung requested a review from PeterSolMS August 20, 2021 02:08
Copy link
Contributor

@PeterSolMS PeterSolMS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@PeterSolMS
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me.

Perhaps we should protect against DACCESS_COMPILE being defined after all through some source code or build change though?

Something like:

#ifdef DACCESS_COMPILE
#error this source file should not be compiled with DACCESS_COMPILE!
#endif //DACCESS_COMPILE

@cshung
Copy link
Member Author

cshung commented Aug 31, 2021

Looks good to me.

Perhaps we should protect against DACCESS_COMPILE being defined after all through some source code or build change though?

Something like:

#ifdef DACCESS_COMPILE
#error this source file should not be compiled with DACCESS_COMPILE!
#endif //DACCESS_COMPILE

I will add this in my next PR.

@cshung cshung merged commit 8b94b58 into dotnet:main Aug 31, 2021
@cshung cshung deleted the experiment-only branch August 31, 2021 16:58
@cshung
Copy link
Member Author

cshung commented Aug 31, 2021

#58120

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 30, 2021
# for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? #.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants