Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[release/6.0.1xx] Backport Add Blazor SWA Baseline Mismatched Assets Logging #28894

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 10, 2022

Conversation

TanayParikh
Copy link
Contributor

Backports #27542

Related: #28883

* Add Blazor AssetDifferencesDetails

* Update AspNetSdkBaselineTest.cs

For https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/issues/27346

* Spacing

* Create blazor-swa-baseline-generation.md

* PR Feedback

* Remove instructions add script reference

* Property level comparison

* Added instructions

* Update AspNetSdkBaselineTest.cs

* Update AspNetSdkBaselineTest.cs

(cherry picked from commit bacc17c)
@TanayParikh TanayParikh added Area-AspNetCore RazorSDK, BlazorWebAssemblySDK, dotnet-watch and removed Area-Infrastructure labels Nov 3, 2022
@build-analysis build-analysis bot mentioned this pull request Nov 4, 2022
2 tasks
@TanayParikh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@marcpopMSFT fine to merge?

@marcpopMSFT
Copy link
Member

The branch is open for changes and no tactics approval is needed for test changes. Will this make the tests more reliable? I assume you'll want Pr approval from someone else on your team to review but then merge whenever.

@javiercn
Copy link
Member

@marcpopMSFT this will make it easier to update the baselines.

In parallel we are looking to see if we can "relax" the way we compare the baselines a bit to be more robust to changes.

@TanayParikh TanayParikh merged commit 57b5a97 into release/6.0.1xx Nov 10, 2022
@TanayParikh TanayParikh deleted the taparik/backport_bacc17c6f7_6.0.1xx branch November 10, 2022 17:44
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Area-AspNetCore RazorSDK, BlazorWebAssemblySDK, dotnet-watch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants