[CT-1237] enable messages and add ante decorator to the chain #2375
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request focus on enhancing the functionality of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
protocol/x/accountplus/module.go (2)
64-69: LGTM! Consider adding error logging before panic.The implementation correctly registers the gRPC gateway routes for the module, which aligns with the PR objective of enabling messaging functionality.
Consider adding error logging before the panic to provide more context for debugging:
func (AppModuleBasic) RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutes(clientCtx client.Context, mux *runtime.ServeMux) { err := types.RegisterQueryHandlerClient(context.Background(), mux, types.NewQueryClient(clientCtx)) if err != nil { + log.Printf("Failed to register query handler client: %v", err) panic(err) } }
129-130: LGTM! Consider adding a descriptive comment.The implementation correctly registers both QueryServer and MsgServer, which aligns with the PR objective of enabling messaging functionality.
Consider adding a brief comment to explain the purpose of this method:
func (am AppModule) RegisterServices(cfg module.Configurator) { + // Register the query and message servers for the accountplus module types.RegisterQueryServer(cfg.QueryServer(), am.keeper) types.RegisterMsgServer(cfg.MsgServer(), keeper.NewMsgServerImpl(am.keeper)) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- protocol/app/ante.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/app/msgs/all_msgs.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/app/msgs/internal_msgs.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/app/msgs/internal_msgs_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/app/msgs/normal_msgs.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/app/msgs/normal_msgs_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/accountplus/ante/circuit_breaker.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/accountplus/ante/circuit_breaker_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/accountplus/module.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/accountplus/types/codec.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
protocol/x/accountplus/module.go (1)
Line range hint
1-163: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The modifications to
RegisterGRPCGatewayRoutesandRegisterServicessuccessfully enable messaging functionality for the accountplus module. The implementation follows Cosmos SDK conventions and integrates well with the existing code structure.protocol/x/accountplus/ante/circuit_breaker_test.go (1)
153-154: Simplification ofCircuitBreakerDecoratorinstantiationThe change simplifies the instantiation of
CircuitBreakerDecoratorby directly passingmockTestAuthenticatorandmockTestClassicinstead of wrapping them withsdk.ChainAnteDecorators. This modification appears to maintain the core functionality while reducing code complexity.However, to ensure the test accurately represents the production code:
- Verify that this change aligns with how
CircuitBreakerDecoratoris instantiated in the actual implementation.- Confirm that
CircuitBreakerDecoratorcan handle individual decorators as well as decorator chains.To validate the consistency with the actual implementation, please run the following script:
This script will help us understand how
CircuitBreakerDecoratoris used and defined in the actual codebase, ensuring our test accurately reflects the production code.✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
CircuitBreakerDecoratorinstantiation aligns with production usage.The simplified instantiation in the test correctly mirrors how
CircuitBreakerDecoratoris utilized in the codebase by accepting individualAnteDecorators. No inconsistencies or issues were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of NewCircuitBreakerDecorator in the codebase # Search for NewCircuitBreakerDecorator usage echo "Searching for NewCircuitBreakerDecorator usage:" rg --type go "NewCircuitBreakerDecorator\(" -A 3 -B 1 # Search for CircuitBreakerDecorator struct definition echo "\nSearching for CircuitBreakerDecorator struct definition:" rg --type go "type CircuitBreakerDecorator struct" -A 10Length of output: 2397
protocol/app/msgs/internal_msgs_test.go (1)
66-69: LGTM! New message types foraccountplusmodule added.The addition of
MsgSetActiveStateandMsgSetActiveStateResponsefor theaccountplusmodule is consistent with the existing structure and naming conventions. This change appears to be part of implementing new functionality for account state management.To ensure consistency with the
accountplusmodule implementation, please run the following script:This will help confirm that the new message types are properly implemented in the
accountplusmodule.✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful! The new message types for the
accountplusmodule are properly defined and implemented.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of MsgSetActiveState and MsgSetActiveStateResponse in the accountplus module # Test: Search for MsgSetActiveState and MsgSetActiveStateResponse in the accountplus module rg --type go -e 'MsgSetActiveState' -e 'MsgSetActiveStateResponse' $(fd -t d -d 1 accountplus) # Expected output: Definitions or usages of these message types in the accountplus module filesLength of output: 7148
protocol/app/msgs/normal_msgs_test.go (1)
121-126: LGTM: New message paths foraccountplusmodule added correctly.The new message paths for the
accountplusmodule have been added correctly and in the proper alphabetical order. This addition suggests new functionality related to account authentication, which aligns with the PR objectives of enabling messaging functionality.To ensure consistency, please verify that these new message types are properly implemented in the corresponding files. You can use the following script to check for their implementations:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: New
accountplusmessage types are fully implemented and tested.The implementations for
MsgAddAuthenticator,MsgRemoveAuthenticator, andTxExtensionare present and appropriately registered in theprotocol/x/accountplusmodule. Corresponding tests have been added to ensure their functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of new accountplus message types # Test: Search for the implementation of new message types rg --type go -e "MsgAddAuthenticator" -e "MsgRemoveAuthenticator" -e "TxExtension" ./protocol/x/accountplusLength of output: 18357
protocol/app/msgs/internal_msgs.go (3)
19-19: New import for accountplus module addedThe new import for the
accountplusmodule has been correctly added. This import is necessary for the new message types that are being introduced in theInternalMsgSamplesDydxCustommap.
19-19: Summary of changes and potential impactThe changes introduce new message types (
MsgSetActiveStateandMsgSetActiveStateResponse) for theaccountplusmodule. This addition aligns with the PR objective of enabling messaging functionality, specifically related to setting an active state for accounts.These changes have the following potential impacts:
- They enable new functionality for account state management.
- They maintain consistency with the existing code structure and patterns.
- They may require corresponding changes in other parts of the codebase to fully implement and utilize this new functionality.
To ensure full implementation:
Let's check for any related changes in the
accountplusmodule:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for related changes in the accountplus module echo "Searching for files with recent changes in the accountplus module:" git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD | grep 'protocol/x/accountplus' echo "Searching for new functions or methods related to SetActiveState:" rg --type go 'func.*SetActiveState' protocol/x/accountplusThis will help identify any related changes and ensure that the new message types are properly integrated into the
accountplusmodule.Also applies to: 116-119
116-119: New message types added for accountplus moduleTwo new entries have been added to the
InternalMsgSamplesDydxCustommap:
"/dydxprotocol.accountplus.MsgSetActiveState"with a value of&accountplus.MsgSetActiveState{}"/dydxprotocol.accountplus.MsgSetActiveStateResponse"with anilvalueThese additions are consistent with the pattern used for other custom messages in this map. The
nilvalue for the response type is also consistent with other response types in this map.However, to ensure completeness:
Let's verify if these new message types are properly defined in the
accountplusmodule:This will help confirm that these new message types are properly defined in the
accountplusmodule.protocol/app/msgs/normal_msgs.go (1)
225-232: LGTM. Please clarify the purpose ofTxExtension.The additions of
MsgAddAuthenticator,MsgRemoveAuthenticator, and their respective response types align well with the PR objectives of enabling messaging functionality. These new message types enhance account management capabilities, particularly in authentication.However, could you please elaborate on the purpose and usage of the
TxExtensiontype? Understanding its role would help in assessing how it relates to the ante decorator mentioned in the PR objectives.protocol/app/msgs/all_msgs.go (1)
158-167: New message types added for theaccountplusmoduleThe changes introduce seven new message types for the
accountplusmodule, expanding the functionality of the application. These new types include operations for adding and removing authenticators, setting active state, and a transaction extension. The implementation follows the existing naming conventions and is correctly integrated into theAllTypeMessagesmap.This addition enhances the capabilities of the
accountplusmodule, potentially allowing for more flexible account management and authentication processes.protocol/x/accountplus/types/codec.go (2)
6-7: Approved: Necessary imports addedThe imports of
"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/msgservice"and"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/tx"are required for the implementation of message services and transaction extension options.
24-24: Approved: Message service descriptor registeredThe call to
msgservice.RegisterMsgServiceDescregisters the_Msg_serviceDesc. This is necessary for enabling message services within the module.protocol/x/accountplus/ante/circuit_breaker.go (2)
47-47: Invocation ofAnteHandleon decorator is appropriateThe call to
AnteHandleonauthenticatorAnteHandlerFlowcorrectly aligns with the updated use ofsdk.AnteDecorator. This ensures that the decorator pattern is properly utilized.
51-51: Invocation ofAnteHandleon decorator is appropriateThe call to
AnteHandleonoriginalAnteHandlerFlowis appropriate following the change tosdk.AnteDecorator, maintaining consistency in the ante handler flow.protocol/app/ante.go (1)
125-136: Proper Integration of Ante DecoratorsThe
sigVerificationfield has been updated to include a composition of theCircuitBreakerDecorator,AuthenticatorDecorator, andSigVerificationDecorator. This enhances the transaction verification process by adding circuit-breaking capabilities and improved authentication handling.
| registry.RegisterImplementations((*tx.TxExtensionOptionI)(nil), &TxExtension{}) | ||
|
|
||
| registry.RegisterImplementations( | ||
| (*AuthenticatorTxOptions)(nil), | ||
| &TxExtension{}, | ||
| ) | ||
| msgservice.RegisterMsgServiceDesc(registry, &_Msg_serviceDesc) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
TxExtension does not implement the required methods for tx.TxExtensionOptionI and AuthenticatorTxOptions.
- Missing method:
Marshal() ([]byte, error) - Missing method:
GetSelectedAuthenticators() []uint64
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify that TxExtension implements the required interfaces
The RegisterInterfaces function now registers TxExtension as an implementation of tx.TxExtensionOptionI and AuthenticatorTxOptions. Ensure that TxExtension correctly implements all methods required by these interfaces.
Run the following script to confirm the implementation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that TxExtension implements tx.TxExtensionOptionI and AuthenticatorTxOptions
# Check for methods implementing tx.TxExtensionOptionI
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (TxExtension) Marshal() ([]byte, error) { $$$ }'
# Check for methods implementing AuthenticatorTxOptions
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (TxExtension) GetSelectedAuthenticators() []uint64 { $$$ }'
Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all methods implemented by TxExtension
# Retrieve all method declarations for TxExtension
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (TxExtension) $_() $_ { $$$ }'
Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that TxExtension implements tx.TxExtensionOptionI and AuthenticatorTxOptions using pointer receivers
# Check for methods implementing tx.TxExtensionOptionI with pointer receiver
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (*TxExtension) Marshal() ([]byte, error) { $$$ }'
# Check for methods implementing AuthenticatorTxOptions with pointer receiver
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (*TxExtension) GetSelectedAuthenticators() []uint64 { $$$ }'
# List all methods implemented by TxExtension with pointer receivers
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (*TxExtension) $_() $_ { $$$ }'
Length of output: 482
| authenticatorAnteHandlerFlow sdk.AnteDecorator | ||
| originalAnteHandlerFlow sdk.AnteDecorator |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider renaming variables to reflect their updated types
The fields authenticatorAnteHandlerFlow and originalAnteHandlerFlow have been changed from type sdk.AnteHandler to sdk.AnteDecorator. To improve clarity and maintain consistency with their new types, consider renaming them to authenticatorAnteDecoratorFlow and originalAnteDecoratorFlow.
| auth sdk.AnteDecorator, | ||
| classic sdk.AnteDecorator, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update parameter names to enhance readability
In the NewCircuitBreakerDecorator function, the parameters auth and classic are now of type sdk.AnteDecorator. To make the code more readable and to reflect their types, consider renaming them to authDecorator and classicDecorator.
| @@ -163,7 +172,7 @@ type lockingAnteHandler struct { | |||
| validateSigCount ante.ValidateSigCountDecorator | |||
| incrementSequence ante.IncrementSequenceDecorator | |||
| replayProtection customante.ReplayProtectionDecorator | |||
| sigVerification customante.SigVerificationDecorator | |||
| sigVerification accountplusante.CircuitBreakerDecorator | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider Typing sigVerification as sdk.AnteDecorator for Flexibility
Currently, sigVerification is declared as accountplusante.CircuitBreakerDecorator. To promote interface-based design and improve maintainability, consider changing the type to sdk.AnteDecorator, the interface implemented by all ante decorators. This allows for easier substitution and testing of different decorators.
Apply this diff to update the type:
- sigVerification accountplusante.CircuitBreakerDecorator
+ sigVerification sdk.AnteDecorator📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| sigVerification accountplusante.CircuitBreakerDecorator | |
| sigVerification sdk.AnteDecorator |
Changelist
[Describe or list the changes made in this PR]
Test Plan
[Describe how this PR was tested (if applicable)]
Author/Reviewer Checklist
state-breakinglabel.indexer-postgres-breakinglabel.PrepareProposalorProcessProposal, manually add the labelproposal-breaking.feature:[feature-name].backport/[branch-name].refactor,chore,bug.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
accountplusmodule.Bug Fixes
CircuitBreakerDecoratorfor better execution flow.Tests
Chores