Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Website Improvements #42

Open
1 of 2 tasks
vince-fugnitto opened this issue Aug 26, 2019 · 6 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

Website Improvements #42

vince-fugnitto opened this issue Aug 26, 2019 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@vince-fugnitto
Copy link
Member

vince-fugnitto commented Aug 26, 2019

I had a quick look at the website and found a few issues:

  • improve the wording, typos, sentence structure (for example: 'We belief VS Code...')
  • update images/gifs (a lot of the images showcase an outdated application which does not have the updated UI, and even textmate highlighting) Showcase update Theia UI #25

As a side note, how was the order of contributors & adopters decided, it's also different from that of the mock-up from #31

@nisarhassan12 nisarhassan12 self-assigned this Aug 26, 2019
@nisarhassan12
Copy link
Contributor

@jankeromnes Please have a look at this whenever you have Time 🙂

@jankeromnes
Copy link
Member

update images/gifs (a lot of the images showcase an outdated application which does not have the updated UI, and even textmate highlighting)

Agreed, we should definitely do that. 👍

As a side note, how was the order of contributors & adopters decided, it's also different from that of the mock-up from #31

I think it was ordered arbitrarily. If the order isn't correct, what would be a better order?

@vince-fugnitto
Copy link
Member Author

update images/gifs (a lot of the images showcase an outdated application which does not have the updated UI, and even textmate highlighting)

Agreed, we should definitely do that.

👍

As a side note, how was the order of contributors & adopters decided, it's also different from that of the mock-up from #31

I think it was ordered arbitrarily. If the order isn't correct, what would be a better order?

I was thinking perhaps alphabetical would be less controversial since it's unbiased? (people would be less likely to complain or feel as though if their company is last its negative). Else, I wondered ordering by the time the contributors (companies) joined the project.

@svenefftinge
Copy link
Contributor

I wondered ordering by the time the contributors (companies) joined the project.

+1

That would be:

TypeFox, Ericsson, RedHat, Arm, Google, IBM, SAP

@svenefftinge
Copy link
Contributor

As a side note, how was the order of contributors & adopters decided, it's also different from that of the mock-up from #31

I have updated the order.

@nisarhassan12
Copy link
Contributor

  • update images/gifs (a lot of the images showcase an outdated application which does not have the updated UI, and even textmate highlighting) Showcase update Theia UI #25

@vince-fugnitto Can you please provide the new images/gif and so if you are comfortable and have time?

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants