Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom

New RDFS reasoner with better performance on stable schemas #643

Closed
hmottestad opened this issue Nov 8, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed

New RDFS reasoner with better performance on stable schemas #643

hmottestad opened this issue Nov 8, 2016 · 0 comments
Labels
📶 enhancement issue is a new feature or improvement
Milestone
2.2

Comments

@hmottestad
Copy link
Contributor

hmottestad commented Nov 8, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Create a new reasoner that:

  • Uses a fixed point rule approach on the Tbox to create an inference map
  • Uses the map to infer new triples during data insert
@hmottestad hmottestad mentioned this issue Nov 8, 2016
Merged
@abrokenjester abrokenjester added the 📶 enhancement issue is a new feature or improvement label Nov 9, 2016
@abrokenjester abrokenjester added this to the 2.2 milestone Jan 16, 2017
@abrokenjester abrokenjester changed the title Improve the speed of the RDFS reasoner New RDFS reasoner with better performance on stable schemas Jan 16, 2017
abrokenjester added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2017
@abrokenjester
#643 class names shortened and number of tests trimmed a bit
ae72799 
Signed-off-by: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@gmail.com>
@abrokenjester abrokenjester mentioned this issue Feb 1, 2017
Merged
abrokenjester added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2017
@abrokenjester
Merge pull request #746 from eclipse/issues/#643-inferencer-name
3367028 
Fix #643: class names shortened and number of tests trimmed a bit
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
📶 enhancement issue is a new feature or improvement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.2
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@abrokenjester @hmottestad