Skip to content

Add Nano32 development board #8

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 33 commits into from
Closed

Add Nano32 development board #8

wants to merge 33 commits into from

Conversation

nazt
Copy link
Contributor

@nazt nazt commented Oct 7, 2016

No description provided.

@me-no-dev
Copy link
Member

Since the configuration is exactly the same as the currently added module, do you mind holding a bit for us to add a bit more features and config options? It will be much easier not to miss some option on a device if we have just one :)

@ESP32DE
Copy link

ESP32DE commented Oct 11, 2016

the configuration is not exact the same , small difference with usb driver

the Nano32 development board pin description is as Pull Request attached
The difference are example DevKitC use CP2xxx , Nano32 use FTDI 231

here the technicals in compare total
Nano32 have a LED on GPIO 16 for Blinky example on the Board

differ_part1

differ_part2_git

screen-shot

arduino_nano32

and the same pin description is as pull request

pinheaders


nano32.upload.tool=esptool
nano32.upload.maximum_size=1044464
nano32.upload.maximum_data_size=114688
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please change upload.maximum_data_size to 294912

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed.

Thank you 👍

@me-no-dev
Copy link
Member

check you PR :) 33 commits 27 files! Close this and try again maybe clean

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants