Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

std::abi #856

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

std::abi #856

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

g-r-a-n-t
Copy link
Member

What was wrong?

How was it fixed?

To-Do

  • OPTIONAL: Update Spec if applicable

  • Add entry to the release notes (may forgo for trivial changes)

  • Clean up commit history

@g-r-a-n-t g-r-a-n-t marked this pull request as draft March 7, 2023 23:32
@Y-Nak
Copy link
Member

Y-Nak commented Mar 7, 2023

Just a question: Is this PR targeting the current fe implementation? I thought you would work on the std for fe-v2 after testing implementation.

@g-r-a-n-t
Copy link
Member Author

Just a question: Is this PR targeting the current fe implementation? I thought you would work on the std for fe-v2 after testing implementation.

this is some non-committal sketch code, ultimately Im targeting v2. is the v2 branch stable enough to work on?

@Y-Nak
Copy link
Member

Y-Nak commented Mar 8, 2023

I don't know how stable it should be for you to start working on it. At least the new parser will work. For semantics, I wouldn't add projection stuff, so basically, it's the same except for trait solving, type inference, and pointer types.

As I said, some std implementations are necessary to implement v2, like encode/decode stuff. So, It'd be better for me if you start targeting v2 implementation. But it's up to you.

@@ -297,3 +297,48 @@ pub struct RawCallBuffer {
return self.buf.writer()
}
}

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

delete this

@g-r-a-n-t g-r-a-n-t closed this Jan 28, 2025
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants