Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

internal/ethapi: don't query wallets at every execution of gas estimation #20261

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2019

Conversation

holiman
Copy link
Contributor

@holiman holiman commented Nov 11, 2019

A user ( @sarvesh-ost ) reported that doing estimateGas with clef as a backend caused it to prompt for approval 26 times.
This PR changes the gas estimator so it resolves the address to use only once, not once for each execution.

@sarvesh-ost , could you please check if this solves the issue?

@karalabe
Copy link
Member

Could you do the same pls in account/abi/bind/backends/simulated.go?

@karalabe
Copy link
Member

Also pls fix the commit msg typos

@karalabe karalabe added this to the 1.9.8 milestone Nov 12, 2019
@fjl fjl changed the title ethernnal/ethapi: don't query wallets at every execution of gas estimation internal/ethapi: don't query wallets at every execution of gas estimation Nov 12, 2019
@fjl
Copy link
Contributor

fjl commented Nov 12, 2019

Why are we auto-setting the sender address at all?

@karalabe
Copy link
Member

karalabe commented Nov 12, 2019

Legacy API behavior, use account[0] if unset.

@karalabe
Copy link
Member

karalabe commented Nov 12, 2019

I'd be happy to start rejecting this behavior, but that's a breaking enough change IMHO to warrant a major Geth version bump (as in 1.10)

@holiman
Copy link
Contributor Author

holiman commented Nov 17, 2019

Could you do the same pls in account/abi/bind/backends/simulated.go?

Afaict, that one doesn't use the accounts. It takes an ethereum.CallMsg where From cannot be nil

Copy link
Member

@karalabe karalabe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants