Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Update trace-recursive-find-content response to match spec changes #1001

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2023

Conversation

njgheorghita
Copy link
Collaborator

@njgheorghita njgheorghita commented Oct 18, 2023

What was wrong?

Changes to the portal_*TraceRecursiveFindContent endpoint in the specs needed implementation.

Fixes #987

How was it fixed?

  • Implemented changes to endpoint
  • Changed ContentId type from NodeId -> [u8; 32]

To-Do

@njgheorghita njgheorghita marked this pull request as ready for review October 18, 2023 20:45
Copy link
Member

@KolbyML KolbyML left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit: looks good

Copy link
Collaborator

@mrferris mrferris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🫡

@njgheorghita
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Holding off on merging this until the spec change gets finalized & merged

@njgheorghita njgheorghita merged commit 38f3a6b into ethereum:master Oct 23, 2023
@njgheorghita njgheorghita deleted the update-trace-rfc branch October 23, 2023 20:06
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

shortcomings of current portal_historyTraceRecursiveFindContent implementation
3 participants